SCHZ vs. SPMD
SCHZ (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHZ is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while SPMD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ returned 1.49%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for SPMD. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHZ vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHZ achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than SPMD's 14.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ has underperformed SPMD with an annualized return of 1.49%, while SPMD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.
SCHZ
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.49%
SPMD
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 14.65%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- 1Y
- 25.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
SCHZ vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.47% | 7.24% | 1.26% | 5.60% | -13.17% | -1.72% | 7.46% | 8.65% | -0.26% | 3.50% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 14.65% | 7.44% | 13.91% | 16.48% | -13.13% | 24.76% | 13.46% | 25.19% | -10.34% | 15.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHZ and SPMD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2011 | -0.05 |
The correlation between SCHZ and SPMD shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHZ vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank
SCHZ
SPMD
SCHZ vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHZ | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.28 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.85 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 10.44 | -5.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHZ vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHZ drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum SPMD drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHZ and SPMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHZ | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -57.62% | +38.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.70% | -8.86% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.18% | -24.08% | +17.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.01% | -24.08% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.74% | -41.86% | +23.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -1.13% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -8.10% | +4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 2.41% | -1.47% |
Volatility
SCHZ vs. SPMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) is 1.15%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that SCHZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHZ | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 4.72% | -3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 11.79% | -9.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 15.90% | -12.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 19.72% | -13.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 21.19% | -15.77% |
SCHZ vs. SPMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHZ and SPMD have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHZ vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison
SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than SPMD's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.05% | 3.96% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 1.23% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.24% | 1.30% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 5.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHZ and SPMD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMD has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to SCHZ (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHZ dropped -18.74% vs SPMD's -57.62%.
On 10-year performance, SPMD leads with 11.86% vs 1.49% for SCHZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMD has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHZ and SPMD have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
SCHZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 1.23% for SPMD.
SCHZ is categorized as Total Bond Market, while SPMD is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SCHZ tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while SPMD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street.
SPMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHZ and SPMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer