PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0U.DE vs. EQQB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SC0U.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (SC0U.DE) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SC0U.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SC0U.DE
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF
-3.93%79.97%32.49%25.93%-7.46%
EQQB.DE
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc
-4.26%6.93%33.67%51.27%-17.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0U.DE achieves a -3.93% return, which is significantly higher than EQQB.DE's -4.26% return.


SC0U.DE

1D
4.23%
1M
-3.60%
YTD
-3.93%
6M
9.73%
1Y
36.13%
3Y*
40.13%
5Y*
27.22%
10Y*
13.28%

EQQB.DE

1D
2.50%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
-4.26%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
16.12%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SC0U.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0U.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQB.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SC0U.DE vs. EQQB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0U.DE
SC0U.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SC0U.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0U.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0U.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0U.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0U.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQB.DE
EQQB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0U.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (SC0U.DE) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0U.DEEQQB.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

0.78

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

1.19

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.17

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

1.57

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.57

4.62

+2.95

SC0U.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0U.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the EQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0U.DE and EQQB.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0U.DEEQQB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

0.78

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.68

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between SC0U.DE and EQQB.DE is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SC0U.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC0U.DE nor EQQB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SC0U.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0U.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.69%, which is greater than EQQB.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0U.DE and EQQB.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0U.DEEQQB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.69%

-26.59%

-34.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.70%

-13.28%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.00%

-7.62%

-3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.56%

-6.99%

-13.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

3.42%

+1.37%

Volatility

SC0U.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (SC0U.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.66% compared to Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE) at 5.05%. This indicates that SC0U.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SC0U.DEEQQB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.66%

5.05%

+4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.76%

11.89%

+4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.08%

20.55%

+4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.39%

20.11%

+3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.69%

20.11%

+5.58%