PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC03.DE vs. XDWS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SC03.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Food & Bev Sector UCITS ETF (SC03.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SC03.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC03.DE
Invesco European Food & Bev Sector UCITS ETF
-1.76%-1.70%-9.00%-1.71%-13.43%21.05%-7.83%28.17%-8.47%12.87%
XDWS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C
5.86%-3.34%12.56%-1.53%-0.06%22.38%-1.96%25.94%-5.88%2.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC03.DE achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly lower than XDWS.DE's 5.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SC03.DE has underperformed XDWS.DE with an annualized return of 0.93%, while XDWS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 5.70% annualized return.


SC03.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
-5.52%
YTD
-1.76%
6M
0.64%
1Y
-7.51%
3Y*
-6.79%
5Y*
-2.22%
10Y*
0.93%

XDWS.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.38%
YTD
5.86%
6M
7.97%
1Y
0.30%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
5.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SC03.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC03.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SC03.DE vs. XDWS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC03.DE
SC03.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
SC03.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC03.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC03.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
SC03.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC03.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWS.DE
XDWS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XDWS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC03.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Food & Bev Sector UCITS ETF (SC03.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC03.DEXDWS.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.49

0.02

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.60

0.12

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.01

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

0.08

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.89

0.14

-1.04

SC03.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC03.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the XDWS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC03.DE and XDWS.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC03.DEXDWS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

0.02

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.54

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.47

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.47

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between SC03.DE and XDWS.DE is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SC03.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC03.DE nor XDWS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SC03.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC03.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, which is greater than XDWS.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC03.DE and XDWS.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SC03.DEXDWS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.59%

-22.95%

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-8.14%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.71%

-12.47%

-16.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

-22.95%

-9.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.55%

-6.33%

-20.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-5.02%

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.87%

4.46%

+4.41%

Volatility

SC03.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Food & Bev Sector UCITS ETF (SC03.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) have volatilities of 4.68% and 4.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SC03.DEXDWS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

4.48%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

8.97%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

12.73%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

11.15%

+2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

12.11%

+2.64%