SBLGX vs. SQQQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SBLGX (ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both funds - SBLGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Over the past 10 years, SBLGX returned 14.37%/yr vs -55.90%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. SBLGX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.

Performance

SBLGX vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBLGX achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -44.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SBLGX has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 14.37%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.90% annualized return.

SBLGX

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: 4.43%
• YTD: 4.27%
• 6M: 3.64%
• 1Y: 10.99%
• 3Y*: 18.41%
• 5Y*: 9.86%
• 10Y*: 14.37%

SQQQ

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: -22.29%
• YTD: -44.43%
• 6M: -42.11%
• 1Y: -64.38%
• 3Y*: -55.94%
• 5Y*: -49.01%
• 10Y*: -55.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBLGX vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SBLGX ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund	4.27%	8.44%	27.60%	45.00%	-32.96%	21.71%	30.84%	31.69%	-0.44%	25.06%
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ	-44.43%	-53.05%	-49.79%	-73.61%	82.40%	-60.87%	-86.40%	-65.92%	-20.83%	-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SBLGX and SQQQ is -0.91, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010	-0.94

The correlation between SBLGX and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.95 to -0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SBLGX vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBLGX

SBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 9
SBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
SBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
SBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
SBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
SBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

SQQQ

SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 0
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBLGX vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SBLGX	SQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	-1.35	+2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	-2.57	+3.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.73	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	-0.98	+1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.10	-1.79	+3.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SBLGX vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBLGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBLGX and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBLGX	SQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	-1.35	+2.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	-0.74	+1.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	-0.85	+1.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	-0.88	+1.36

Drawdowns

SBLGX vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBLGX drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBLGX and SQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBLGX	SQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.64%	-100.00%	+46.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.95%	-65.95%	+49.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.98%	-92.38%	+71.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.28%	-97.23%	+58.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.28%	-99.98%	+61.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	-100.00%	+97.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.91%	-92.40%	+79.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.53%	35.96%	-30.43%

Volatility

SBLGX vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX) is 4.02%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 13.81%. This indicates that SBLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBLGX	SQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	13.81%	-9.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.63%	36.46%	-24.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.18%	47.79%	-32.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.16%	66.61%	-45.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.45%	66.10%	-45.65%

SBLGX vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBLGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBLGX vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SBLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.16%, less than SQQQ's 12.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SBLGX ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund	12.16%	12.68%	5.39%	12.39%	9.34%	12.48%	6.17%	5.12%	4.00%	4.41%	2.08%	2.94%
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ	12.29%	9.36%	10.23%	8.01%	0.28%	0.00%	2.15%	2.92%	1.47%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBLGX and SQQQ in my portfolio?

SBLGX and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.91, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SBLGX or SQQQ?

SQQQ has higher volatility (13.81%) compared to SBLGX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBLGX dropped -53.64% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.