SCHH vs. RWR
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR).
SCHH and RWR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHH is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. It was launched on Jan 13, 2011. RWR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. It was launched on Apr 23, 2001. Both SCHH and RWR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHH or RWR.
Key characteristics
| SCHH | RWR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.40% | 12.81% |
| 1Y Return | 24.41% | 27.32% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.50% | 0.12% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.93% | 3.99% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.61% | 5.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.86 | 2.01 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.66 | 2.91 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.35 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.20 | 1.33 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.28 | 9.27 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.28% | 3.69% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.81% | 17.03% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.22% | -74.92% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.93% | -5.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHH and RWR is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCHH vs. RWR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than RWR's 12.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed RWR with an annualized return of 4.61%, while RWR has yielded a comparatively higher 5.59% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHH vs. RWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than RWR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHH vs. RWR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHH vs. RWR - Dividend Comparison
SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than RWR's 3.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.96% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.87% | 3.66% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% | 2.18% | 2.59% |
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 3.38% | 3.75% | 3.81% | 2.79% | 3.73% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 3.05% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 3.06% | 3.39% |
Drawdowns
SCHH vs. RWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum RWR drawdown of -74.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and RWR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHH vs. RWR - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) have volatilities of 5.15% and 5.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.