PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWM vs. LABU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RWM vs. LABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RWM vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000
-0.52%-9.40%-5.91%-10.43%18.34%-17.90%-31.04%-19.83%11.57%-13.61%
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
4.20%79.17%-26.02%-13.41%-80.36%-64.15%74.66%75.50%-57.61%149.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWM achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than LABU's 4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RWM has outperformed LABU with an annualized return of -11.01%, while LABU has yielded a comparatively lower -11.81% annualized return.


RWM

1D
-3.51%
1M
5.06%
YTD
-0.52%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-19.15%
3Y*
-8.15%
5Y*
-2.92%
10Y*
-11.01%

LABU

1D
22.31%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
4.20%
6M
78.34%
1Y
175.22%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
-36.38%
10Y*
-11.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RWM vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 1.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RWM vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWM
RWM Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
RWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWM Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
RWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWM Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWM vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWMLABUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.83

2.04

-2.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.09

2.48

-3.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.31

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

3.74

-4.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.74

11.90

-12.64

RWM vs. LABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWM Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the LABU Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWM and LABU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWMLABUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.83

2.04

-2.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

-0.38

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.48

-0.12

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

-0.24

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between RWM and LABU is -0.70. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

RWM vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison

RWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than LABU's 0.74% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000
3.57%3.97%6.03%4.78%0.39%0.00%0.20%1.55%0.87%0.07%
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.74%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%

Drawdowns

RWM vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWM drawdown since its inception was -95.12%, roughly equal to the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWM and LABU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RWMLABUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.12%

-99.18%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.53%

-36.66%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.80%

-97.75%

+60.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.94%

-98.96%

+27.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.70%

-96.33%

+1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.85%

-81.45%

+7.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.23%

12.01%

+13.22%

Volatility

RWM vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) is 7.47%, while Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a volatility of 33.99%. This indicates that RWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RWMLABUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

33.99%

-26.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.43%

56.88%

-42.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.18%

87.36%

-64.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

95.74%

-73.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.07%

95.91%

-72.84%