PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RVT vs. ARCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RVT vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVT achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -0.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RVT having a 12.61% annualized return and ARCC not far behind at 12.32%.


RVT

1D
1.88%
1M
-0.22%
6M
9.24%
YTD
18.61%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
12.61%
ALL TIME*
9.64%

ARCC

1D
2.19%
1M
2.35%
6M
3.47%
YTD
-0.17%
1Y
-5.64%
3Y*
9.14%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
12.32%
ALL TIME*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$82.65M$85.21M$94.25M
$4.50M$6.70M$5.92M

RVT vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RVT
Royce Value Trust Inc.
18.61%11.54%17.93%18.79%-26.25%32.66%18.16%35.41%-20.70%30.63%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
-0.17%1.07%19.78%20.03%-3.84%36.14%0.86%31.30%8.81%4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RVT and ARCC is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004

0.52

The correlation between RVT and ARCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RVT:

$2.20B

ARCC:

$13.76B

EPS

RVT:

$4.00

ARCC:

$1.35

PE Ratio

RVT:

4.61

ARCC:

14.20

PS Ratio

RVT:

13.03

ARCC:

6.41

PB Ratio

RVT:

1.03

ARCC:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

RVT:

$170.31M

ARCC:

$2.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RVT:

$304.06M

ARCC:

$1.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

RVT:

$439.27M

ARCC:

$1.26B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RVT vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RVT
RVT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ARCC
ARCC Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ARCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RVT vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RVTARCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.97

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

-0.33

+3.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.84

-0.59

+10.44

RVT vs. ARCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVT Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the ARCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVT and ARCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RVT vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVT drawdown since its inception was -72.34%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVT and ARCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RVTARCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.34%

-79.36%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.19%

-17.35%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.48%

-19.35%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.79%

-21.76%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.18%

-56.77%

+9.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-9.13%

+8.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-9.12%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

9.52%

-6.02%

Volatility

RVT vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) is 4.24%, while Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that RVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RVTARCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.82%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.02%

14.88%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.20%

19.00%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.39%

20.00%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.96%

25.59%

-2.63%

Dividends

RVT vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison

RVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, less than ARCC's 10.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
10.02%9.49%8.77%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%
RVT
Royce Value Trust Inc.
7.81%8.82%8.04%7.35%9.95%8.52%6.44%7.45%10.68%7.17%7.62%10.54%

Financials

RVT vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royce Value Trust Inc. and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RVT and ARCC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARCC has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to RVT (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVT dropped -72.34% vs ARCC's -79.36%.

RVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RVT and ARCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer