RVT vs. ARCC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RVT (Royce Value Trust Inc.) and ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, RVT returned 13.06%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for ARCC. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

RVT vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVT achieves a 15.05% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -5.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RVT having a 13.06% annualized return and ARCC not far behind at 12.56%.

RVT

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: -0.76%
• YTD: 15.05%
• 6M: 16.68%
• 1Y: 33.00%
• 3Y*: 20.83%
• 5Y*: 7.64%
• 10Y*: 13.06%

ARCC

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -2.61%
• YTD: -5.14%
• 6M: -5.66%
• 1Y: -6.58%
• 3Y*: 9.07%
• 5Y*: 8.64%
• 10Y*: 12.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVT vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RVT Royce Value Trust Inc.	15.05%	11.54%	17.93%	18.79%	-26.25%	32.66%	18.16%	35.41%	-20.70%	30.63%
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation	-5.14%	1.07%	19.78%	20.03%	-3.84%	36.14%	0.86%	31.30%	8.81%	4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RVT and ARCC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2004	0.52

The correlation between RVT and ARCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap RVT : $2.19B ARCC : $13.41B
EPS RVT : $4.02 ARCC : $1.63
PE Ratio RVT : 4.53 ARCC : 11.46
PS Ratio RVT : 12.83 ARCC : 5.01
PB Ratio RVT : 1.01 ARCC : 0.95
Total Revenue (TTM) RVT : $170.31M ARCC : $2.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) RVT : $304.06M ARCC : $1.86B
EBITDA (TTM) RVT : $439.27M ARCC : $2.05B

Return for Risk

RVT vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVT

RVT Risk / Return Rank: 83
RVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
RVT Omega Ratio Rank: 81
RVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RVT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

ARCC

ARCC Risk / Return Rank: 25
ARCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
ARCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
ARCC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ARCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
ARCC Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVT vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RVT	ARCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	-0.36	+2.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	-0.38	+2.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.95	+0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	-0.34	+3.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.84	-0.63	+10.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RVT vs. ARCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVT Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the ARCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVT and ARCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RVT	ARCC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	-0.36	+2.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.43	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.49	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.37	+0.04

Drawdowns

RVT vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVT drawdown since its inception was -72.34%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVT and ARCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVT	ARCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.34%	-79.36%	+7.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.19%	-19.35%	+7.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.48%	-19.35%	-4.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.79%	-21.76%	-11.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.18%	-56.77%	+9.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.99%	-13.66%	+10.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.30%	-9.10%	-2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	10.48%	-7.12%

Volatility

RVT vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison

Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.94%. This indicates that RVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RVT	ARCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	3.94%	+1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.42%	14.71%	-1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.87%	18.40%	-0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.42%	19.96%	+2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.96%	25.58%	-2.62%

Dividends

RVT vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison

RVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, less than ARCC's 10.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation	10.28%	9.49%	8.77%	9.59%	10.12%	7.65%	9.47%	9.01%	9.88%	9.67%	9.22%	11.02%
RVT Royce Value Trust Inc.	7.80%	8.82%	8.04%	7.35%	9.95%	8.52%	6.44%	7.45%	10.68%	7.17%	7.62%	10.54%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVT and ARCC in my portfolio?

RVT and ARCC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RVT or ARCC?

RVT has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to ARCC (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVT dropped -72.34% vs ARCC's -79.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.