RVNU vs. CA
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA).
RVNU and CA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RVNU is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2013. CA is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the ICE AMT-Free Broad Liquid California Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 13, 2023. Both RVNU and CA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RVNU vs. CA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RVNU vs. CA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 1.36% | 0.58% | 1.46% | 1.30% |
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF | 0.04% | 3.05% | 1.51% | 0.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RVNU achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than CA's 0.04% return.
RVNU
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 2.94%
- 3Y*
- 2.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
CA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RVNU vs. CA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RVNU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
RVNU vs. CA — Risk / Return Rank
RVNU
CA
RVNU vs. CA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RVNU | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.84 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.53 | 1.11 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.20 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 1.09 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.55 | 3.10 | -1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RVNU | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.84 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.58 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between RVNU and CA is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RVNU vs. CA - Dividend Comparison
RVNU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than CA's 3.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.53% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF | 3.23% | 3.14% | 3.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RVNU vs. CA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RVNU drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, which is greater than CA's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNU and CA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RVNU | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.51% | -5.24% | -18.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.12% | -3.67% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.01% | -1.88% | -3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -1.30% | -3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 1.29% | +1.28% |
Volatility
RVNU vs. CA - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) at 1.27%. This indicates that RVNU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RVNU | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 1.27% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.50% | 1.77% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.94% | 4.38% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.16% | 4.09% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.30% | 4.09% | +3.21% |