RPF.TO vs. HLPR.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF (RPF.TO) and Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO).

RPF.TO and HLPR.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RPF.TO is an actively managed fund by RBC. It was launched on Sep 14, 2016. HLPR.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2019.

Performance

RPF.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF (RPF.TO) and Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RPF.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RPF.TO RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF	1.93%	19.23%	28.54%	3.28%	-18.37%	23.47%	6.47%	0.03%
HLPR.TO Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF	1.87%	18.79%	28.13%	2.89%	-17.83%	23.17%	6.42%	0.80%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RPF.TO having a 1.93% return and HLPR.TO slightly lower at 1.87%.

RPF.TO

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 1.93%
• 6M: 6.76%
• 1Y: 18.88%
• 3Y*: 17.51%
• 5Y*: 7.92%
• 10Y*: —

HLPR.TO

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 6.62%
• 1Y: 18.22%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPF.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPF.TO has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than HLPR.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.

RPF.TO

RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF

HLPR.TO

Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF

Return for Risk

RPF.TO vs. HLPR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPF.TO

RPF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
RPF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
RPF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
RPF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RPF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RPF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

HLPR.TO

HLPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
HLPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
HLPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
HLPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HLPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
HLPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPF.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF (RPF.TO) and Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPF.TO	HLPR.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	2.41	+0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	2.93	+0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.64	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	2.25	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.72	11.76	-0.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPF.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the HLPR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPF.TO and HLPR.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPF.TO	HLPR.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	2.41	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.93	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.61	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between RPF.TO and HLPR.TO is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RPF.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Dividend Comparison

RPF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, while HLPR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
RPF.TO RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF	5.11%	5.08%	5.48%	6.17%	5.65%	4.22%	5.24%	5.06%	4.51%	3.94%	1.10%
HLPR.TO Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RPF.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPF.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.69%, which is greater than HLPR.TO's maximum drawdown of -38.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPF.TO and HLPR.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPF.TO	HLPR.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.69%	-38.96%	-6.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.71%	-8.34%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.37%	-26.79%	+0.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-0.69%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.77%	-6.74%	-1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	1.59%	+0.01%

Volatility

RPF.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Canadian Preferred Share ETF (RPF.TO) is 1.57%, while Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that RPF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLPR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPF.TO	HLPR.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.57%	1.72%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.18%	3.34%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.08%	7.60%	-0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.51%	8.33%	+0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.44%	13.23%	-0.79%