PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPAR vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPAR vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RPAR having a 7.53% return and VNQ slightly higher at 7.83%.


RPAR

1D
-0.47%
1M
1.78%
YTD
7.53%
6M
7.10%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*

VNQ

1D
-0.12%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
7.83%
6M
6.75%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*
5.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPAR vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
7.53%17.91%0.06%6.03%-22.82%7.56%19.40%0.11%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
7.83%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between RPAR and VNQ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019

0.48

The correlation between RPAR and VNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

RPAR vs. VNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RPAR
VNQ

Financial Services

35.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

6.4%
1.1%

Energy

5.9%
0.1%

Healthcare

5.1%

-

Communication Services

4.9%
0.6%

Industrials

2.1%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%

-

Utilities

0.2%

-

Technology

0.1%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Real Estate

-0.0%
97.3%

Financial Services

RPAR
35.9%
VNQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

RPAR
6.4%
VNQ
1.1%

Energy

RPAR
5.9%
VNQ
0.1%

Healthcare

RPAR
5.1%
VNQ

-

Communication Services

RPAR
4.9%
VNQ
0.6%

Industrials

RPAR
2.1%
VNQ
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

RPAR
0.3%
VNQ

-

Utilities

RPAR
0.2%
VNQ

-

Technology

RPAR
0.1%
VNQ
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

RPAR
0.1%
VNQ

-

Real Estate

RPAR
-0.0%
VNQ
97.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPAR vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPAR
RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPAR vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPARVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.14

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.20

+1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.71

3.78

+4.93

RPAR vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPAR and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPARVNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

0.76

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.12

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.26

+0.10

Drawdowns

RPAR vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPAR drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPAR and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPARVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.16%

-73.07%

+42.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-8.34%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.20%

-17.46%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.16%

-34.48%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-3.75%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-13.63%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.64%

-0.20%

Volatility

RPAR vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) have volatilities of 3.56% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPARVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

3.72%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

9.26%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.20%

13.16%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

18.80%

-6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.69%

20.70%

-8.01%

RPAR vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPAR vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than VNQ's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
2.07%2.55%2.51%3.16%4.01%2.02%0.76%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.69%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPAR and VNQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNQ has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to RPAR (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPAR dropped -30.16% vs VNQ's -73.07%.

On 5-year performance, VNQ leads with 2.18% vs 1.76% for RPAR. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VNQ has performed better with a 2.18% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RPAR.

VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.07% for RPAR.

RPAR is categorized as Hedge Fund, while VNQ is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RPAR and 0.13% for VNQ.

RPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPAR and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer