RPAR vs. VNQ
RPAR (RPAR Risk Parity ETF) and VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPAR is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Toroso Investments, while VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. RPAR is actively managed, while VNQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RPAR returned 1.76%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for VNQ. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPAR charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VNQ.
Performance
RPAR vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RPAR having a 7.53% return and VNQ slightly higher at 7.83%.
RPAR
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- —
VNQ
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 7.83%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 9.97%
- 3Y*
- 9.15%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 5.21%
RPAR vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 7.53% | 17.91% | 0.06% | 6.03% | -22.82% | 7.56% | 19.40% | 0.11% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 7.83% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPAR and VNQ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019 | 0.48 |
The correlation between RPAR and VNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
RPAR vs. VNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RPAR
VNQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
RPAR
VNQ
Basic Materials
RPAR
VNQ
Energy
RPAR
VNQ
Healthcare
RPAR
VNQ
-
Communication Services
RPAR
VNQ
Industrials
RPAR
VNQ
Consumer Defensive
RPAR
VNQ
-
Utilities
RPAR
VNQ
-
Technology
RPAR
VNQ
Consumer Cyclical
RPAR
VNQ
-
Real Estate
RPAR
VNQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPAR vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank
RPAR
VNQ
RPAR vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPAR | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.14 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 1.20 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 3.78 | +4.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPAR | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 0.76 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.12 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.26 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
RPAR vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPAR drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPAR and VNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPAR | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.16% | -73.07% | +42.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -8.34% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.20% | -17.46% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.16% | -34.48% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -3.75% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.61% | -13.63% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.64% | -0.20% |
Volatility
RPAR vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison
RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) have volatilities of 3.56% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPAR | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 3.72% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 9.26% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.20% | 13.16% | -2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.40% | 18.80% | -6.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 20.70% | -8.01% |
RPAR vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPAR vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison
RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than VNQ's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 2.07% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 4.01% | 2.02% | 0.76% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.69% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPAR and VNQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNQ has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to RPAR (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPAR dropped -30.16% vs VNQ's -73.07%.
On 5-year performance, VNQ leads with 2.18% vs 1.76% for RPAR. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VNQ has performed better with a 2.18% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RPAR.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.07% for RPAR.
RPAR is categorized as Hedge Fund, while VNQ is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RPAR and 0.13% for VNQ.
RPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPAR and VNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer