RGC vs. MSTY
RGC (Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited) is a stock, while MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, RGC returned -65.76% vs -73.76% for MSTY. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
RGC vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGC achieves a -75.95% return, which is significantly lower than MSTY's -35.55% return.
RGC
- 1D
- -14.12%
- 1M
- -73.18%
- 6M
- -88.55%
- YTD
- -75.95%
- 1Y
- -65.76%
- 3Y*
- -38.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- -23.27%
- 6M
- -39.01%
- YTD
- -35.55%
- 1Y
- -73.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGC vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RGC Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited | -75.95% | 325.10% | -36.59% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -35.55% | -42.71% | 212.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGC and MSTY is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024 | -0.01 |
The correlation between RGC and MSTY shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGC vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
RGC
MSTY
RGC vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited (RGC) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGC | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.75 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.95 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | -1.41 | -0.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGC vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGC drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, which is greater than MSTY's maximum drawdown of -77.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGC and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGC | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.42% | -77.40% | -22.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -90.45% | -77.40% | -13.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.42% | -74.66% | -24.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -28.01% | -37.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.50% | 52.19% | -10.69% |
Volatility
RGC vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited (RGC) has a higher volatility of 55.49% compared to YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) at 23.76%. This indicates that RGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGC | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.49% | 23.76% | +31.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 102.61% | 53.06% | +49.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 145.19% | 64.61% | +80.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 282.67% | 72.32% | +210.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 282.67% | 72.32% | +210.35% |
Dividends
RGC vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
RGC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 289.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 289.43% | 294.61% | 104.56% |
RGC Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGC and MSTY have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGC has higher volatility (55.49%) compared to MSTY (23.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGC dropped -99.42% vs MSTY's -77.40%.
RGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGC and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer