REL.L vs. WKL.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about RELX PLC (REL.L) and Wolters Kluwer N.V. (WKL.AS).
Performance
REL.L vs. WKL.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
REL.L vs. WKL.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REL.L RELX PLC | -17.48% | -15.41% | 18.77% | 38.84% | -2.70% | 37.27% | -3.44% | 20.74% | -4.64% | 22.85% |
WKL.AS Wolters Kluwer N.V. | -26.07% | -40.94% | 20.73% | 31.26% | 0.92% | 43.55% | 14.32% | 20.67% | 22.53% | 34.51% |
Different Trading Currencies
REL.L is traded in GBp, while WKL.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WKL.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REL.L achieves a -17.48% return, which is significantly higher than WKL.AS's -26.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with REL.L having a 9.17% annualized return and WKL.AS not far ahead at 9.38%.
REL.L
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- -17.48%
- 6M
- -28.76%
- 1Y
- -35.26%
- 3Y*
- 0.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
WKL.AS
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- -26.07%
- 6M
- -42.75%
- 1Y
- -52.00%
- 3Y*
- -16.37%
- 5Y*
- -0.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REL.L vs. WKL.AS — Risk / Return Rank
REL.L
WKL.AS
REL.L vs. WKL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RELX PLC (REL.L) and Wolters Kluwer N.V. (WKL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REL.L | WKL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | -1.64 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | -2.62 | +1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.67 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.86 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | -1.50 | -0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REL.L | WKL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.13 | -1.64 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | -0.02 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.42 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.43 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between REL.L and WKL.AS is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
REL.L vs. WKL.AS - Dividend Comparison
REL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than WKL.AS's 3.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REL.L RELX PLC | 2.58% | 2.13% | 1.65% | 1.80% | 2.24% | 1.99% | 2.55% | 2.27% | 2.48% | 2.15% | 2.25% | 2.21% |
WKL.AS Wolters Kluwer N.V. | 3.73% | 2.75% | 1.37% | 1.48% | 1.70% | 1.38% | 1.82% | 1.58% | 1.92% | 1.84% | 2.21% | 2.87% |
Drawdowns
REL.L vs. WKL.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REL.L drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum WKL.AS drawdown of -64.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REL.L and WKL.AS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| REL.L | WKL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -80.22% | +29.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.99% | -62.88% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.99% | -66.39% | +15.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.99% | -66.39% | +15.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.32% | -63.35% | +24.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.84% | -26.10% | +14.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.95% | 36.64% | -13.69% |
Volatility
REL.L vs. WKL.AS - Volatility Comparison
RELX PLC (REL.L) and Wolters Kluwer N.V. (WKL.AS) have volatilities of 6.67% and 6.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| REL.L | WKL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 6.58% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.95% | 25.67% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.00% | 31.47% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 22.79% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 21.99% | -0.76% |
Financials
REL.L vs. WKL.AS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RELX PLC and Wolters Kluwer N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities