REGB.L vs. CMOP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L).
REGB.L and CMOP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. REGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2021. CMOP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity. It was launched on Jan 9, 2017. Both REGB.L and CMOP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
REGB.L vs. CMOP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
REGB.L vs. CMOP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 21.06% | 75.67% | -34.55% | -22.78% | -22.89% | 14.56% |
CMOP.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc | 26.85% | 8.23% | 6.01% | -12.72% | 28.44% | -1.36% |
Different Trading Currencies
REGB.L is traded in GBP, while CMOP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMOP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGB.L achieves a 21.06% return, which is significantly lower than CMOP.L's 26.85% return.
REGB.L
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- 21.06%
- 6M
- 30.40%
- 1Y
- 122.76%
- 3Y*
- 0.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMOP.L
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- 26.85%
- 6M
- 34.06%
- 1Y
- 29.90%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.69%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
REGB.L vs. CMOP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGB.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CMOP.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
REGB.L vs. CMOP.L — Risk / Return Rank
REGB.L
CMOP.L
REGB.L vs. CMOP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REGB.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 1.79 | +0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.26 | 2.36 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.33 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.38 | 4.48 | +1.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.80 | 11.13 | +6.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REGB.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 1.79 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.46 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between REGB.L and CMOP.L is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
REGB.L vs. CMOP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither REGB.L nor CMOP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
REGB.L vs. CMOP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGB.L drawdown since its inception was -72.41%, which is greater than CMOP.L's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGB.L and CMOP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGB.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.41% | -28.78% | -43.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.93% | -7.63% | -13.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.28% | 0.00% | -29.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.80% | -12.34% | -28.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.50% | 3.07% | +4.43% |
Volatility
REGB.L vs. CMOP.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) has a higher volatility of 14.53% compared to Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L) at 8.38%. This indicates that REGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMOP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| REGB.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.53% | 8.38% | +6.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.25% | 13.53% | +21.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.15% | 16.68% | +27.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.78% | 16.14% | +28.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.78% | 14.90% | +29.88% |