RDMIX vs. DNAVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rational/ReSolve Adaptive Asset Allocation Fund (RDMIX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX).
RDMIX is managed by Rational Funds. It was launched on Sep 29, 2016. DNAVX is managed by Dunham. It was launched on Apr 28, 2010.
Performance
RDMIX vs. DNAVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RDMIX vs. DNAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDMIX Rational/ReSolve Adaptive Asset Allocation Fund | 2.69% | 5.07% | 9.88% | -0.52% | -3.06% | 11.18% | 0.65% | 18.24% | -7.65% | 3.85% |
DNAVX Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund | 2.75% | 5.12% | 6.13% | 18.70% | -14.02% | 9.29% | 1.63% | 13.99% | -8.44% | 8.09% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RDMIX having a 2.69% return and DNAVX slightly higher at 2.75%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RDMIX having a 3.86% annualized return and DNAVX not far ahead at 3.98%.
RDMIX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 11.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 3.86%
DNAVX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- 7.38%
- 3Y*
- 9.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RDMIX vs. DNAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDMIX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than DNAVX's 1.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RDMIX vs. DNAVX — Risk / Return Rank
RDMIX
DNAVX
RDMIX vs. DNAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rational/ReSolve Adaptive Asset Allocation Fund (RDMIX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDMIX | DNAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.77 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 2.61 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.37 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 3.71 | -2.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.13 | 15.58 | -12.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDMIX | DNAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.77 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.59 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.47 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.33 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between RDMIX and DNAVX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RDMIX vs. DNAVX - Dividend Comparison
RDMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than DNAVX's 11.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDMIX Rational/ReSolve Adaptive Asset Allocation Fund | 0.88% | 0.90% | 6.81% | 10.63% | 0.39% | 16.40% | 0.47% | 15.46% | 0.94% | 0.07% |
DNAVX Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund | 11.25% | 11.56% | 0.00% | 3.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 2.42% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RDMIX vs. DNAVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDMIX drawdown since its inception was -31.57%, which is greater than DNAVX's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDMIX and DNAVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDMIX | DNAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.57% | -17.73% | -13.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -2.13% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.96% | -17.12% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.92% | -17.73% | -4.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.06% | -1.28% | -2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.52% | -3.91% | -4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 0.51% | +2.99% |
Volatility
RDMIX vs. DNAVX - Volatility Comparison
Rational/ReSolve Adaptive Asset Allocation Fund (RDMIX) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX) at 2.28%. This indicates that RDMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RDMIX | DNAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 2.28% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.71% | 3.25% | +5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.82% | 4.40% | +9.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 8.68% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 8.46% | +2.90% |