RDIV vs. VTI
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDIV returned 11.09%/yr vs 15.13%/yr for VTI. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
RDIV vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.09%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.13% annualized return.
RDIV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
VTI
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
RDIV vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 13.43% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -4.78% | 11.63% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 12.01% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and VTI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RDIV and VTI has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RDIV vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDIV
VTI
Energy
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Technology
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
RDIV
VTI
Financial Services
RDIV
VTI
Consumer Defensive
RDIV
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
RDIV
VTI
Real Estate
RDIV
VTI
Healthcare
RDIV
VTI
Utilities
RDIV
VTI
Technology
RDIV
VTI
Basic Materials
RDIV
VTI
Communication Services
RDIV
-
VTI
Industrials
RDIV
-
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
VTI
RDIV vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDIV | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 2.48 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.38 | 3.37 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.45 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.12 | 3.44 | +2.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.06 | 15.88 | +2.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDIV | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.48 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.75 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.83 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.51 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -55.45% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -8.92% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -19.30% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -25.36% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | -35.00% | -14.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | 0.00% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -8.03% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 1.93% | -0.29% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.86%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 2.86% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 9.11% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 12.15% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 17.40% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 18.30% | +3.59% |
RDIV vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDIV vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.61% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and VTI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDIV has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.13% vs 11.09% for RDIV. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.13% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.
RDIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer