PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDIV vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDIV vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.09%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.13% annualized return.


RDIV

1D
0.14%
1M
2.82%
YTD
13.43%
6M
12.91%
1Y
29.73%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
11.09%

VTI

1D
0.26%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.40%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDIV vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
13.43%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%11.63%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.01%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and VTI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between RDIV and VTI has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RDIV vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDIV
VTI

Energy

28.8%
3.7%

Financial Services

18.0%
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

15.9%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.0%

Real Estate

8.0%
2.4%

Healthcare

7.8%
9.2%

Utilities

6.4%
2.3%

Technology

5.1%
33.5%

Basic Materials

0.5%
2.0%

Communication Services

-

10.3%

Industrials

-

9.8%

Energy

RDIV
28.8%
VTI
3.7%

Financial Services

RDIV
18.0%
VTI
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

RDIV
15.9%
VTI
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

RDIV
9.5%
VTI
10.0%

Real Estate

RDIV
8.0%
VTI
2.4%

Healthcare

RDIV
7.8%
VTI
9.2%

Utilities

RDIV
6.4%
VTI
2.3%

Technology

RDIV
5.1%
VTI
33.5%

Basic Materials

RDIV
0.5%
VTI
2.0%

Communication Services

RDIV

-

VTI
10.3%

Industrials

RDIV

-

VTI
9.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDIV vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDIV vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDIVVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

2.48

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.38

3.37

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.12

3.44

+2.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.06

15.88

+2.18

RDIV vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDIVVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.48

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.75

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.83

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.51

+0.04

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDIVVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-55.45%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

-8.92%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-19.30%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

-25.36%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

-35.00%

-14.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

0.00%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-8.03%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.93%

-0.29%

Volatility

RDIV vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.86%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDIVVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

2.86%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

9.11%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

12.15%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

17.40%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.89%

18.30%

+3.59%

RDIV vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDIV vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.61%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDIV and VTI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDIV has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.13% vs 11.09% for RDIV. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.13% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

RDIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDIV and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer