RCUS vs. SCHZ
RCUS (Arcus Biosciences, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHZ (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Over the past 5 years, RCUS returned -0.97%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SCHZ. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RCUS vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCUS achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than SCHZ's 0.30% return.
RCUS
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- -6.91%
- 1Y
- 137.89%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- -0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
RCUS vs. SCHZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCUS Arcus Biosciences, Inc. | 0.13% | 60.04% | -22.04% | -7.64% | -48.90% | 55.89% | 157.03% | -6.22% | -36.65% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.30% | 7.24% | 1.26% | 5.60% | -13.17% | -1.72% | 7.46% | 8.65% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCUS and SCHZ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2018 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCUS vs. SCHZ — Risk / Return Rank
RCUS
SCHZ
RCUS vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCUS | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.24 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.99 | 1.92 | +3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.31 | 5.87 | +6.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCUS | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 1.37 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.01 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.44 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
RCUS vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCUS drawdown since its inception was -85.83%, which is greater than SCHZ's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCUS and SCHZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCUS | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.83% | -18.74% | -67.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.78% | -2.70% | -25.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.82% | -6.18% | -64.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.83% | -18.01% | -67.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.77% | -2.47% | -48.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.54% | -3.68% | -42.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.26% | 0.88% | +10.38% |
Volatility
RCUS vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison
Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) has a higher volatility of 12.17% compared to Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) at 1.24%. This indicates that RCUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCUS | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.17% | 1.24% | +10.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.19% | 2.67% | +43.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.22% | 3.79% | +58.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.12% | 6.08% | +61.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.34% | 5.41% | +70.93% |
Dividends
RCUS vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison
RCUS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCUS Arcus Biosciences, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.05% | 3.96% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCUS and SCHZ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCUS has higher volatility (12.17%) compared to SCHZ (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCUS dropped -85.83% vs SCHZ's -18.74%.
RCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCUS and SCHZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer