PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RCDC.TO vs. EQLI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RCDC.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RCDC.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RCDC.TO
RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF
4.14%19.29%7.17%
EQLI.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
2.05%6.40%7.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCDC.TO achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than EQLI.TO's 2.05% return.


RCDC.TO

1D
1.42%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
4.14%
6M
9.56%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
10Y*

EQLI.TO

1D
1.76%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.84%
1Y
8.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RCDC.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCDC.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than EQLI.TO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RCDC.TO vs. EQLI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCDC.TO
RCDC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RCDC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCDC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCDC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
RCDC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCDC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

EQLI.TO
EQLI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EQLI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCDC.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RCDC.TOEQLI.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

0.62

+1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.80

0.94

+1.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.13

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

0.80

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.84

3.19

+10.65

RCDC.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCDC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the EQLI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCDC.TO and EQLI.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RCDC.TOEQLI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

0.62

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

0.80

+0.51

Correlation

The correlation between RCDC.TO and EQLI.TO is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RCDC.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Dividend Comparison

RCDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, less than EQLI.TO's 8.67% yield.


TTM202520242023
RCDC.TO
RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF
6.55%6.38%6.46%6.49%
EQLI.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
8.67%8.74%3.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RCDC.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum EQLI.TO drawdown of -15.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCDC.TO and EQLI.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RCDC.TOEQLI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-15.57%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-12.16%

+2.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-3.03%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-2.64%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

3.05%

-1.38%

Volatility

RCDC.TO vs. EQLI.TO - Volatility Comparison

RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) have volatilities of 3.73% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RCDC.TOEQLI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.72%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.70%

7.25%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.10%

13.83%

-2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.22%

12.50%

-2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.22%

12.50%

-2.28%