RCD vs. XLY
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RCD) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY).
RCD and XLY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RCD is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. XLY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both RCD and XLY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RCD or XLY.
Performance
RCD vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCD achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly lower than XLY's 20.13% return. Over the past 10 years, RCD has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 7.43%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
RCD
13.87%
1.38%
11.82%
27.73%
9.46%
7.43%
XLY
20.13%
7.30%
19.94%
29.61%
12.97%
13.23%
Key characteristics
| RCD | XLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.72 | 1.60 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.39 | 2.20 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.30 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.47 | 1.41 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.56 | 7.65 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.22% | 3.70% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.07% | 17.73% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.25% | -59.05% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.67% | -2.74% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RCD vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between RCD and XLY is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RCD vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RCD) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RCD vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
RCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than XLY's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCD Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.85% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.59% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.05% | 0.87% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.70% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 1.31% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
RCD vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCD drawdown since its inception was -69.25%, which is greater than XLY's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCD and XLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RCD vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RCD) is 3.94%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that RCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.