RCD.TO vs. FCCD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO).
RCD.TO and FCCD.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RCD.TO is managed by RBC. FCCD.TO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Dividend Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2018.
Performance
RCD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RCD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCD.TO RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF | 5.56% | 21.74% | 10.79% | 10.31% | -3.37% | 27.62% | -1.89% | 21.59% | -10.93% |
FCCD.TO Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF | 8.44% | 25.05% | 16.92% | 3.35% | -4.04% | 29.46% | -8.44% | 20.71% | -8.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCD.TO achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than FCCD.TO's 8.44% return.
RCD.TO
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.46%
FCCD.TO
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- 30.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RCD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCD.TO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FCCD.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RCD.TO vs. FCCD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RCD.TO
FCCD.TO
RCD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCD.TO | FCCD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 2.70 | -1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 3.46 | -1.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.57 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 3.20 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | 17.33 | -9.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCD.TO | FCCD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 2.70 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 1.09 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.59 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between RCD.TO and FCCD.TO is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RCD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Dividend Comparison
RCD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than FCCD.TO's 2.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCD.TO RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF | 3.05% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 3.39% | 3.36% | 2.34% | 3.45% | 3.12% | 3.64% | 3.01% | 3.08% | 3.62% |
FCCD.TO Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF | 2.80% | 3.56% | 4.27% | 4.65% | 4.01% | 3.02% | 4.74% | 3.80% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RCD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCD.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.07%, smaller than the maximum FCCD.TO drawdown of -43.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCD.TO and FCCD.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCD.TO | FCCD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.07% | -43.53% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -9.92% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.68% | -19.24% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -1.95% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -6.52% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 1.83% | +1.17% |
Volatility
RCD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Volatility Comparison
RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) at 3.96%. This indicates that RCD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCCD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RCD.TO | FCCD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 3.96% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 6.96% | +5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.88% | 11.41% | +3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 11.49% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 17.26% | -2.79% |