PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLE vs. LQTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QYLE vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QYLE vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


QYLE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LQTI

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QYLE vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLE has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QYLE vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLE

LQTI
LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLE vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QYLE vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QYLELQTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

Dividends

QYLE vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

QYLE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.07%.


Drawdowns

QYLE vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLE drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum LQTI drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLE and LQTI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLELQTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-3.41%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.03%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.78%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

Volatility

QYLE vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QYLELQTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

6.23%

-6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

6.11%

-6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

6.11%

-6.11%