PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QREARX vs. BRIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QREARX vs. BRIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) and Baron Real Estate Income Fund (BRIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QREARX vs. BRIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QREARX
TIAA Real Estate Account
0.61%3.93%
BRIIX
Baron Real Estate Income Fund
1.12%2.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QREARX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than BRIIX's 1.12% return.


QREARX

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.61%
6M
1.65%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BRIIX

1D
1.77%
1M
-5.14%
YTD
1.12%
6M
0.24%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QREARX vs. BRIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QREARX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BRIIX's 1.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QREARX vs. BRIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QREARX
QREARX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
QREARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QREARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
QREARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
QREARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
QREARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BRIIX
BRIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BRIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BRIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QREARX vs. BRIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) and Baron Real Estate Income Fund (BRIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QREARXBRIIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.69

0.37

+4.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

7.22

0.61

+6.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.65

1.08

+1.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.74

0.53

+9.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

40.50

2.34

+38.16

QREARX vs. BRIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QREARX Sharpe Ratio is 4.69, which is higher than the BRIIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QREARX and BRIIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QREARXBRIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.69

0.37

+4.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.12

0.42

+1.71

Correlation

The correlation between QREARX and BRIIX is -0.11. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

QREARX vs. BRIIX - Dividend Comparison

QREARX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QREARX
TIAA Real Estate Account
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BRIIX
Baron Real Estate Income Fund
1.60%1.70%1.39%1.95%2.00%1.21%0.77%1.12%3.03%

Drawdowns

QREARX vs. BRIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QREARX drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum BRIIX drawdown of -37.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QREARX and BRIIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QREARXBRIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-37.06%

+35.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.37%

-12.70%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-5.92%

+5.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-8.75%

+8.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.09%

2.89%

-2.80%

Volatility

QREARX vs. BRIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) is 0.30%, while Baron Real Estate Income Fund (BRIIX) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that QREARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QREARXBRIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

4.77%

-4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.53%

9.05%

-8.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77%

15.94%

-15.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.76%

18.33%

-16.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.76%

20.72%

-18.96%