QQQY.L vs. TSLI.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L).

QQQY.L and TSLI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQY.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Aug 27, 2024. TSLI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jul 18, 2024.

Performance

QQQY.L vs. TSLI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QQQY.L vs. TSLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQY.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP	-8.98%	14.25%	7.28%
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP	-13.66%	40.52%	41.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY.L achieves a -8.98% return, which is significantly higher than TSLI.L's -13.66% return.

QQQY.L

• 1D: -4.38%
• 1M: -7.58%
• YTD: -8.98%
• 6M: -6.97%
• 1Y: 7.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSLI.L

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -5.28%
• YTD: -13.66%
• 6M: -0.28%
• 1Y: 64.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY.L vs. TSLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

TSLI.L

IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP

QQQY.L

IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP

Return for Risk

QQQY.L vs. TSLI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY.L

QQQY.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
QQQY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
QQQY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
QQQY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
QQQY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

TSLI.L

TSLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TSLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
TSLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
TSLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
TSLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY.L vs. TSLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQY.L	TSLI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	1.64	-1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	2.22	-1.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.28	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	3.12	-2.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.17	8.03	-4.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQY.L vs. TSLI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY.L and TSLI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQY.L	TSLI.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43	1.64	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.71	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY.L and TSLI.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QQQY.L vs. TSLI.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 100.37%, more than TSLI.L's 72.52% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
QQQY.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP	100.37%	120.60%	18.65%
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP	72.52%	73.68%	19.21%

Drawdowns

QQQY.L vs. TSLI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY.L drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum TSLI.L drawdown of -41.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.L and TSLI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQY.L	TSLI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.23%	-41.20%	+21.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-20.29%	+9.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.84%	-19.06%	+8.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.44%	-11.63%	+8.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	7.89%	-5.24%

Volatility

QQQY.L vs. TSLI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) is 6.30%, while IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) has a volatility of 8.56%. This indicates that QQQY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQY.L	TSLI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.30%	8.56%	-2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.55%	22.82%	-12.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.53%	39.64%	-22.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.59%	43.11%	-21.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.59%	43.11%	-21.52%