PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY.L vs. GOOI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQY.L vs. GOOI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQY.L vs. GOOI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP
-9.63%14.25%4.37%
GOOI.L
IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP
-6.22%45.15%17.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY.L achieves a -9.63% return, which is significantly lower than GOOI.L's -6.22% return.


QQQY.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
-7.19%
YTD
-9.63%
6M
-7.84%
1Y
7.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOI.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
-6.22%
6M
10.37%
1Y
60.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQY.L vs. GOOI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQY.L vs. GOOI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY.L
QQQY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOI.L
GOOI.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY.L vs. GOOI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQY.LGOOI.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

2.30

-1.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.68

3.07

-2.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.37

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

3.94

-2.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.66

14.30

-9.63

QQQY.L vs. GOOI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the GOOI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY.L and GOOI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQY.LGOOI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

2.30

-1.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

1.38

-1.08

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY.L and GOOI.L is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQQY.L vs. GOOI.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.09%, more than GOOI.L's 19.59% yield.


TTM20252024
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP
101.09%120.60%18.65%
GOOI.L
IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP
19.59%11.19%2.00%

Drawdowns

QQQY.L vs. GOOI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY.L drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum GOOI.L drawdown of -26.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.L and GOOI.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQY.LGOOI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-26.69%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-16.53%

+5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.48%

-14.18%

+2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-6.37%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

4.55%

-2.04%

Volatility

QQQY.L vs. GOOI.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L) have volatilities of 5.97% and 6.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQY.LGOOI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

6.14%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

16.17%

-5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

26.09%

-8.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

25.91%

-4.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

25.91%

-4.34%