PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY.L vs. 3QQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP
-8.98%14.25%7.28%
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
-19.09%13.90%30.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY.L achieves a -8.98% return, which is significantly higher than 3QQQ.L's -19.09% return.


QQQY.L

1D
-4.38%
1M
-7.58%
YTD
-8.98%
6M
-6.97%
1Y
7.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

3QQQ.L

1D
8.72%
1M
-10.76%
YTD
-19.09%
6M
-16.94%
1Y
36.33%
3Y*
38.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than 3QQQ.L's 0.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQY.L vs. 3QQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY.L
QQQY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQY.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.43

0.52

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.65

1.26

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.18

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

0.72

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.17

1.62

+1.55

QQQY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is comparable to the 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY.L and 3QQQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQY.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

0.52

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.27

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY.L and 3QQQ.L is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQQY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 100.37%, while 3QQQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

QQQY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY.L drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum 3QQQ.L drawdown of -58.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.L and 3QQQ.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQY.L3QQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-58.93%

+39.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-47.89%

+36.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.84%

-42.24%

+31.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-20.85%

+17.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

21.13%

-18.48%

Volatility

QQQY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) is 6.30%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) has a volatility of 16.78%. This indicates that QQQY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3QQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQY.L3QQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

16.78%

-10.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

53.33%

-42.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.53%

70.29%

-52.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.59%

63.86%

-42.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

63.86%

-42.27%