QQQQ.TO vs. QDX.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO).
QQQQ.TO and QDX.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQQ.TO is a passively managed fund by Mackenzie that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Aug 19, 2025. QDX.TO is a passively managed fund by Mackenzie that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index. It was launched on Jan 24, 2018. Both QQQQ.TO and QDX.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QQQQ.TO vs. QDX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQQQ.TO vs. QDX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQQ.TO Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | -6.15% | 7.64% |
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 3.97% | 4.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQQ.TO achieves a -6.15% return, which is significantly lower than QDX.TO's 3.97% return.
QQQQ.TO
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- -6.15%
- 6M
- -4.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDX.TO
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQQQ.TO vs. QDX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QDX.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
QQQQ.TO vs. QDX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQQ.TO
QDX.TO
QQQQ.TO vs. QDX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQQ.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.52 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQQ.TO and QDX.TO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QQQQ.TO vs. QDX.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than QDX.TO's 2.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQQ.TO Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 2.79% | 2.51% | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.25% | 1.91% | 2.76% | 3.03% |
Drawdowns
QQQQ.TO vs. QDX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.95%, smaller than the maximum QDX.TO drawdown of -28.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQQ.TO and QDX.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQQ.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.95% | -28.08% | +16.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.17% | -5.38% | -4.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -4.59% | +0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility
QQQQ.TO vs. QDX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQQQ.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 16.97% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 13.73% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 15.43% | +1.09% |