QKACX vs. FGJEX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX).

QKACX is an actively managed fund by Federated Hermes. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. FGJEX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025.

Performance

QKACX vs. FGJEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QKACX vs. FGJEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	-4.88%	25.40%
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	-0.45%	24.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QKACX achieves a -4.88% return, which is significantly lower than FGJEX's -0.45% return.

QKACX

• 1D: 3.04%
• 1M: -4.68%
• YTD: -4.88%
• 6M: -1.60%
• 1Y: 18.57%
• 3Y*: 20.53%
• 5Y*: 14.46%
• 10Y*: 15.56%

FGJEX

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -4.79%
• YTD: -0.45%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QKACX vs. FGJEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QKACX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FGJEX's 0.46% expense ratio.

QKACX

Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6

FGJEX

Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

QKACX vs. FGJEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QKACX

QKACX Risk / Return Rank: 61
QKACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
QKACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
QKACX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QKACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QKACX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QKACX vs. FGJEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QKACX	FGJEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.54	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QKACX	FGJEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	2.34	-1.89

Correlation

The correlation between QKACX and FGJEX is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QKACX vs. FGJEX - Dividend Comparison

QKACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than FGJEX's 9.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	4.96%	4.72%	8.90%	1.45%	11.20%	17.85%	3.09%	3.41%	8.83%	0.74%	0.00%	0.52%
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	9.63%	9.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QKACX vs. FGJEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QKACX drawdown since its inception was -60.51%, which is greater than FGJEX's maximum drawdown of -8.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QKACX and FGJEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QKACX	FGJEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.51%	-8.32%	-52.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.88%	-5.93%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.30%	-1.07%	-10.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QKACX	FGJEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.19%	11.08%	+5.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.38%	11.08%	+6.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	11.08%	+7.64%