QDTY vs. COSW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW).

QDTY and COSW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDTY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Feb 12, 2025. COSW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Oct 23, 2025.

Performance

QDTY vs. COSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QDTY vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	-6.47%	3.33%
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	17.20%	-10.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTY achieves a -6.47% return, which is significantly lower than COSW's 17.20% return.

QDTY

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: -4.80%
• YTD: -6.47%
• 6M: -2.12%
• 1Y: 17.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COSW

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: 17.20%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTY vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than COSW's 0.99% expense ratio.

QDTY

YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

COSW

Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF

Return for Risk

QDTY vs. COSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTY

QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 43
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTY vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDTY	COSW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.99	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDTY	COSW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.44	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between QDTY and COSW is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

QDTY vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison

QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.68%, more than COSW's 12.26% yield.

	TTM	2025
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	36.68%	26.82%
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	12.26%	4.96%

Drawdowns

QDTY vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than COSW's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and COSW.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDTY	COSW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.45%	-12.17%	-11.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.44%	-3.28%	-6.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-4.05%	-0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QDTY	COSW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.08%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.80%	25.36%	+1.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.93%	25.36%	+1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.93%	25.36%	+1.57%