PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDAY.NEO vs. XQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QDAY.NEO vs. XQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QDAY.NEO vs. XQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDAY.NEO achieves a -11.66% return, which is significantly lower than XQQ.TO's -5.44% return.


QDAY.NEO

1D
1.64%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
-11.66%
6M
-15.40%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XQQ.TO

1D
1.10%
1M
-4.10%
YTD
-5.44%
6M
-4.10%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
20.76%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
16.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QDAY.NEO vs. XQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QDAY.NEO vs. XQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDAY.NEO

XQQ.TO
XQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDAY.NEO vs. XQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QDAY.NEO vs. XQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDAY.NEOXQQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

-1.31

+1.10

Correlation

The correlation between QDAY.NEO and XQQ.TO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QDAY.NEO vs. XQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

QDAY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, more than XQQ.TO's 0.27% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDAY.NEO
Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF
5.37%4.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
0.27%0.25%0.32%0.31%0.43%0.17%0.26%0.46%0.52%0.53%0.76%0.62%

Drawdowns

QDAY.NEO vs. XQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDAY.NEO drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, smaller than the maximum XQQ.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDAY.NEO and XQQ.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QDAY.NEOXQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.46%

-100.00%

+74.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.83%

-99.98%

+78.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-99.99%

+92.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

Volatility

QDAY.NEO vs. XQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QDAY.NEOXQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.28%

22.25%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.28%

22.53%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.28%

22.29%

+0.99%