QDAY.NEO vs. CMVP.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO).

QDAY.NEO and CMVP.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDAY.NEO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton Capital. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025. CMVP.TO is a passively managed fund by Hamilton Capital that tracks the performance of the Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index. It was launched on Jan 24, 2025.

Performance

QDAY.NEO vs. CMVP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QDAY.NEO vs. CMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF	-13.08%	9.17%
CMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units	7.10%	12.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDAY.NEO achieves a -13.08% return, which is significantly lower than CMVP.TO's 7.10% return.

QDAY.NEO

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: -13.08%
• 6M: -15.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMVP.TO

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -3.44%
• YTD: 7.10%
• 6M: 11.38%
• 1Y: 27.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDAY.NEO vs. CMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CMVP.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.

QDAY.NEO

Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF

CMVP.TO

HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units

Return for Risk

QDAY.NEO vs. CMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMVP.TO

CMVP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 95
CMVP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CMVP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CMVP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CMVP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CMVP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDAY.NEO vs. CMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDAY.NEO	CMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	2.25	-2.56

Correlation

The correlation between QDAY.NEO and CMVP.TO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QDAY.NEO vs. CMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison

QDAY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than CMVP.TO's 2.55% yield.

	TTM	2025
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF	5.46%	4.74%
CMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units	2.55%	2.70%

Drawdowns

QDAY.NEO vs. CMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDAY.NEO drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, which is greater than CMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDAY.NEO and CMVP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDAY.NEO	CMVP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.46%	-8.86%	-16.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.08%	-3.88%	-19.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.89%	-1.06%	-6.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QDAY.NEO	CMVP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.27%	11.46%	+11.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.27%	11.22%	+12.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.27%	11.22%	+12.05%