QCLN.DE vs. LYM9.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE) and Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE).

QCLN.DE and LYM9.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QCLN.DE is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. It was launched on Mar 5, 2021. LYM9.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. It was launched on Oct 10, 2007. Both QCLN.DE and LYM9.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

QCLN.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE) and Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QCLN.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QCLN.DE First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc	3.38%	16.50%	-14.54%	-10.39%	-26.09%	-12.74%
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist	17.98%	29.63%	-7.97%	-21.17%	-13.14%	-2.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLN.DE achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly lower than LYM9.DE's 17.98% return.

QCLN.DE

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 6M: 9.88%
• 1Y: 49.23%
• 3Y*: -4.76%
• 5Y*: -7.49%
• 10Y*: —

LYM9.DE

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: 17.98%
• 6M: 26.61%
• 1Y: 62.49%
• 3Y*: 3.32%
• 5Y*: -0.93%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCLN.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QCLN.DE and LYM9.DE have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

QCLN.DE

First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc

LYM9.DE

Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

QCLN.DE vs. LYM9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLN.DE

QCLN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 76
QCLN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QCLN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
QCLN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QCLN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
QCLN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 87

LYM9.DE

LYM9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 97
LYM9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LYM9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LYM9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 96
LYM9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LYM9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCLN.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE) and Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QCLN.DE	LYM9.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	2.93	-1.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	3.52	-1.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.50	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.30	8.62	-4.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.32	29.82	-17.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QCLN.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCLN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the LYM9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCLN.DE and LYM9.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QCLN.DE	LYM9.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	2.93	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	-0.04	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.26	0.02	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between QCLN.DE and LYM9.DE is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QCLN.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Dividend Comparison

QCLN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYM9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QCLN.DE First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist	0.36%	0.42%	0.74%	0.78%	0.25%	0.31%	0.70%	1.12%	0.67%	0.89%	1.50%	2.23%

Drawdowns

QCLN.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLN.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.59%, roughly equal to the maximum LYM9.DE drawdown of -72.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLN.DE and LYM9.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCLN.DE	LYM9.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.59%	-72.01%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.04%	-10.48%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.59%	-55.00%	-14.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.68%	-15.88%	-28.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.34%	-43.19%	+3.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.89%	2.26%	+2.63%

Volatility

QCLN.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) at 7.22%. This indicates that QCLN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYM9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCLN.DE	LYM9.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.76%	7.22%	+2.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.40%	15.56%	+9.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.15%	21.24%	+14.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.06%	22.22%	+13.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.51%	21.67%	+14.84%