QCELX vs. PAGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX).
QCELX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Mar 26, 2013. PAGRX is managed by Permanent Portfolio. It was launched on Jan 2, 1990.
Performance
QCELX vs. PAGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QCELX vs. PAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund | -0.05% | 23.38% | 22.73% | 26.30% | -15.73% | 27.18% | 14.93% | 24.33% | -10.96% | 22.73% |
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio | -0.28% | 36.92% | 44.52% | 38.73% | -26.06% | 24.84% | 37.65% | 40.34% | -12.41% | 21.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCELX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly higher than PAGRX's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, QCELX has underperformed PAGRX with an annualized return of 13.18%, while PAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.12% annualized return.
QCELX
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- 28.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
PAGRX
- 1D
- 3.71%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 43.96%
- 3Y*
- 35.66%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- 19.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QCELX vs. PAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCELX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than PAGRX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QCELX vs. PAGRX — Risk / Return Rank
QCELX
PAGRX
QCELX vs. PAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCELX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 1.74 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 2.49 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 3.21 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 16.28 | -3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCELX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.74 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.72 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.78 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.53 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between QCELX and PAGRX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QCELX vs. PAGRX - Dividend Comparison
QCELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.41%, more than PAGRX's 0.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund | 14.41% | 14.40% | 12.89% | 13.67% | 11.05% | 12.41% | 9.94% | 5.36% | 7.81% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 0.89% |
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio | 0.03% | 0.03% | 5.62% | 2.72% | 7.79% | 6.82% | 15.08% | 17.51% | 12.33% | 8.70% | 16.94% | 6.31% |
Drawdowns
QCELX vs. PAGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCELX drawdown since its inception was -33.52%, smaller than the maximum PAGRX drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCELX and PAGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCELX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.52% | -55.87% | +22.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.68% | -13.80% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.70% | -36.52% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.52% | -38.01% | +4.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.23% | -5.77% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -10.09% | +4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.73% | -0.39% |
Volatility
QCELX vs. PAGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) is 5.33%, while Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that QCELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QCELX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 6.77% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 13.91% | -3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.73% | 25.69% | -6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 24.53% | -5.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 24.49% | -5.53% |