PZZA vs. XLY
PZZA (Papa John's International, Inc.) is a stock, while XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, PZZA returned -4.08%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for XLY. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PZZA vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZZA achieves a -5.75% return, which is significantly lower than XLY's -4.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PZZA has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of -4.08%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.
PZZA
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- -5.75%
- 6M
- -6.94%
- 1Y
- -24.40%
- 3Y*
- -17.51%
- 5Y*
- -17.04%
- 10Y*
- -4.08%
XLY
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -4.35%
- 6M
- -6.51%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
PZZA vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZZA Papa John's International, Inc. | -5.75% | -2.01% | -44.21% | -5.28% | -37.26% | 58.87% | 35.88% | 61.50% | -27.80% | -33.68% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -4.35% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZZA and XLY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PZZA and XLY has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZZA vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
PZZA
XLY
PZZA vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Papa John's International, Inc. (PZZA) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PZZA | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.08 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 0.47 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 1.40 | -2.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PZZA vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZZA drawdown since its inception was -76.22%, which is greater than XLY's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZZA and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZZA | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.22% | -59.05% | -17.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.11% | -14.98% | -28.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.15% | -26.01% | -36.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.22% | -39.67% | -36.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.22% | -39.67% | -36.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.73% | -8.28% | -62.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.18% | -9.55% | -16.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.24% | 4.97% | +22.27% |
Volatility
PZZA vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
Papa John's International, Inc. (PZZA) has a higher volatility of 16.22% compared to Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) at 6.48%. This indicates that PZZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZZA | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.22% | 6.48% | +9.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.89% | 13.82% | +24.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.97% | 18.55% | +32.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.97% | 23.91% | +18.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.95% | 22.09% | +19.86% |
Dividends
PZZA vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
PZZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than XLY's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZZA Papa John's International, Inc. | 5.21% | 4.78% | 4.48% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 0.86% | 1.06% | 1.43% | 2.26% | 1.51% | 0.88% | 1.13% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.79% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZZA and XLY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZZA has higher volatility (16.22%) compared to XLY (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZZA dropped -76.22% vs XLY's -59.05%.
XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZZA and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer