PXWIX vs. GSIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Leadership Fund Institutional Class (PXWIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX).
PXWIX is managed by Pax World Funds. GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
PXWIX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PXWIX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXWIX Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Leadership Fund Institutional Class | -6.93% | 17.72% | 12.41% | 18.41% | -19.77% | 17.58% | 13.94% | 26.80% | -7.55% | 25.15% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -5.52% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXWIX achieves a -6.93% return, which is significantly lower than GSIFX's -5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PXWIX has outperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 9.09%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.34% annualized return.
PXWIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -8.29%
- YTD
- -6.93%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- 12.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
GSIFX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PXWIX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXWIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PXWIX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank
PXWIX
GSIFX
PXWIX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Leadership Fund Institutional Class (PXWIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXWIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.60 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 0.91 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.12 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 0.81 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | 3.23 | +1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXWIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.60 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.32 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.48 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.30 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between PXWIX and GSIFX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PXWIX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison
PXWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.72%, more than GSIFX's 2.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXWIX Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Leadership Fund Institutional Class | 10.72% | 9.98% | 9.64% | 1.69% | 3.24% | 1.44% | 1.25% | 3.24% | 5.15% | 2.71% | 2.04% | 2.68% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.31% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
PXWIX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXWIX drawdown since its inception was -53.56%, smaller than the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXWIX and GSIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXWIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.56% | -59.25% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.21% | -12.15% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.52% | -31.94% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.47% | -35.00% | +0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.44% | -11.48% | +2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -15.30% | +5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 3.06% | -0.59% |
Volatility
PXWIX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Leadership Fund Institutional Class (PXWIX) is 4.55%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that PXWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PXWIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 6.71% | -2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.86% | 11.13% | -2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.26% | 16.87% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 16.71% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 17.32% | -0.40% |