PXSCX vs. PAXDX
PXSCX (Pax Small Cap Fund) and PAXDX (Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - PXSCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Pax World, while PAXDX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Pax World. Over the past 5 years, PXSCX returned 6.58%/yr vs 4.02%/yr for PAXDX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXSCX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for PAXDX.
Performance
PXSCX vs. PAXDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXSCX achieves a 16.68% return, which is significantly higher than PAXDX's 5.11% return.
PXSCX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 16.68%
- 6M
- 13.68%
- 1Y
- 37.40%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
PAXDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 6.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.02%
- 10Y*
- —
PXSCX vs. PAXDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSCX Pax Small Cap Fund | 16.68% | 11.53% | 14.55% | 13.51% | -22.99% | 30.34% | 11.81% | 23.29% | -15.96% | 8.78% |
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund | 5.11% | 18.37% | -1.55% | 9.33% | -13.45% | 14.24% | 14.25% | 25.88% | -4.25% | 19.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXSCX and PAXDX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2016 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PXSCX and PAXDX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXSCX vs. PAXDX — Risk / Return Rank
PXSCX
PAXDX
PXSCX vs. PAXDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax Small Cap Fund (PXSCX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXSCX | PAXDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.21 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 1.69 | +1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 5.03 | +8.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXSCX vs. PAXDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXSCX drawdown since its inception was -51.55%, which is greater than PAXDX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXSCX and PAXDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXSCX | PAXDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.55% | -33.58% | -17.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -4.49% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.52% | -14.56% | -10.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.25% | -25.04% | -7.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.74% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -5.25% | -4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 1.47% | +1.34% |
Volatility
PXSCX vs. PAXDX - Volatility Comparison
Pax Small Cap Fund (PXSCX) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) at 0.00%. This indicates that PXSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXSCX | PAXDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 0.00% | +4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 4.06% | +8.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.24% | 7.94% | +9.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 13.16% | +7.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 16.48% | +4.43% |
PXSCX vs. PAXDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXSCX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXDX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXSCX vs. PAXDX - Dividend Comparison
PXSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, more than PAXDX's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund | 1.06% | 2.17% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 2.48% | 58.94% | 2.88% | 4.69% | 3.55% | 2.13% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
PXSCX Pax Small Cap Fund | 5.55% | 6.47% | 5.19% | 0.00% | 2.47% | 9.60% | 3.87% | 0.89% | 14.72% | 1.56% | 2.24% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXSCX and PAXDX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXSCX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to PAXDX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXSCX dropped -51.55% vs PAXDX's -33.58%.
PXSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXSCX and PAXDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer