PSLV vs. SQQQ
PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - PSLV is a Silver fund tracking the No Index (Physical Silver), while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSLV returned 14.02%/yr vs -55.90%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. PSLV charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
PSLV vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSLV achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -44.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PSLV has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 14.02%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.90% annualized return.
PSLV
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- 23.11%
- 1Y
- 102.24%
- 3Y*
- 42.33%
- 5Y*
- 18.65%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -22.29%
- YTD
- -44.43%
- 6M
- -42.11%
- 1Y
- -64.38%
- 3Y*
- -55.94%
- 5Y*
- -49.01%
- 10Y*
- -55.90%
PSLV vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | -0.89% | 145.08% | 19.43% | -1.94% | 2.74% | -14.13% | 42.81% | 16.99% | -11.83% | 4.28% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -44.43% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSLV and SQQQ is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010 | -0.15 |
The correlation between PSLV and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSLV vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
PSLV
SQQQ
PSLV vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSLV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.73 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | -0.98 | +3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.58 | -1.79 | +7.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSLV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | -1.35 | +3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | -0.74 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | -0.85 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | -0.88 | +1.05 |
Drawdowns
PSLV vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSLV drawdown since its inception was -79.38%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLV and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSLV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.38% | -100.00% | +20.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.65% | -65.95% | +25.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.65% | -92.38% | +51.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.65% | -97.23% | +56.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.79% | -99.98% | +57.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.53% | -100.00% | +64.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.15% | -92.40% | +34.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.38% | 35.96% | -17.58% |
Volatility
PSLV vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) at 13.81%. This indicates that PSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSLV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.60% | 13.81% | +2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.34% | 36.46% | +20.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.49% | 47.79% | +10.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.64% | 66.61% | -30.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 66.10% | -34.96% |
PSLV vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSLV has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSLV vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 12.29% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSLV and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSLV has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to SQQQ (13.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSLV dropped -79.38% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, PSLV leads with 14.02% vs -55.90% for SQQQ. On fees, PSLV is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, SQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSLV has performed better with a 14.02% return vs -55.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSLV is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.29%, compared with 0.00% for PSLV.
PSLV is categorized as Silver, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. PSLV tracks No Index (Physical Silver), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Sprott and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for PSLV and 0.95% for SQQQ.
PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSLV and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer