PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSH vs. FTSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSH vs. FTSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) and First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSH vs. FTSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PSH
PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF
0.41%7.34%7.96%0.38%
FTSL
First Trust Senior Loan Fund
-0.80%5.98%8.27%0.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSH achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly higher than FTSL's -0.80% return.


PSH

1D
1.05%
1M
0.01%
YTD
0.41%
6M
1.51%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTSL

1D
0.34%
1M
1.11%
YTD
-0.80%
6M
0.87%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
4.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSH vs. FTSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSL's 0.86% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PSH vs. FTSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSH
PSH Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FTSL
FTSL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FTSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSH vs. FTSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) and First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSHFTSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.51

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

1.99

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

1.96

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.56

7.07

+3.49

PSH vs. FTSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSH Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the FTSL Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSH and FTSL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSHFTSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.51

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.16

0.83

+1.32

Correlation

The correlation between PSH and FTSL is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PSH vs. FTSL - Dividend Comparison

PSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than FTSL's 6.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSH
PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF
7.61%6.62%8.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTSL
First Trust Senior Loan Fund
6.58%6.59%7.56%7.59%4.77%3.17%3.48%4.44%4.29%3.64%3.70%3.95%

Drawdowns

PSH vs. FTSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSH drawdown since its inception was -3.06%, smaller than the maximum FTSL drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSH and FTSL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSHFTSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-22.67%

+19.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-2.33%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-1.24%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.27%

-0.77%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

0.65%

-0.04%

Volatility

PSH vs. FTSL - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) at 1.37%. This indicates that PSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSHFTSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.37%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.98%

1.90%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

3.11%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.30%

3.36%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.30%

5.19%

-1.89%