PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSA.TO vs. USFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSA.TO vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSA.TO vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund
0.51%2.64%4.56%5.12%2.34%0.60%0.93%2.22%1.65%1.09%
USFR
WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund
2.30%-0.55%14.53%2.86%9.25%-0.93%-1.14%-3.00%10.66%-5.40%
Different Trading Currencies

PSA.TO is traded in CAD, while USFR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the USFR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSA.TO achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PSA.TO has underperformed USFR with an annualized return of 2.23%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively higher 3.09% annualized return.


PSA.TO

1D
0.01%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.51%
6M
1.10%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
2.23%

USFR

1D
0.00%
1M
2.01%
YTD
2.30%
6M
1.80%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
3.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSA.TO vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSA.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

PSA.TO vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSA.TO
PSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSA.TO vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSA.TOUSFRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

10.29

0.23

+10.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

28.35

0.34

+28.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

6.22

1.04

+5.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

121.90

0.15

+121.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

422.60

0.29

+422.31

PSA.TO vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 10.29, which is higher than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSA.TO and USFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSA.TOUSFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.29

0.23

+10.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

11.42

0.89

+10.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

9.61

0.45

+9.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

9.23

0.53

+8.70

Correlation

The correlation between PSA.TO and USFR is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

PSA.TO vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

PSA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than USFR's 4.00% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund
2.41%2.61%4.47%5.05%2.26%0.59%0.94%2.18%1.66%1.07%0.99%1.07%
USFR
WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund
4.00%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%0.00%

Drawdowns

PSA.TO vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSA.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum USFR drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSA.TO and USFR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSA.TOUSFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-1.36%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-0.04%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.04%

-0.18%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.04%

-0.80%

+0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.16%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.01%

0.00%

Volatility

PSA.TO vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO) is 0.06%, while WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that PSA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSA.TOUSFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

1.38%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.17%

3.45%

-3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24%

5.37%

-5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.27%

6.44%

-6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.23%

6.90%

-6.67%