PRME vs. BEAM
PRME (Prime Medicine Inc. Common Stock) and BEAM (Beam Therapeutics Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Biotechnology industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 3 years, PRME returned -39.21%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for BEAM. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PRME vs. BEAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRME achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than BEAM's 28.17% return.
PRME
- 1D
- 4.33%
- 1M
- 13.47%
- YTD
- -2.88%
- 6M
- -8.92%
- 1Y
- 62.80%
- 3Y*
- -39.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEAM
- 1D
- 4.07%
- 1M
- 24.06%
- YTD
- 28.17%
- 6M
- 27.26%
- 1Y
- 111.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- -16.23%
- 10Y*
- —
PRME vs. BEAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRME Prime Medicine Inc. Common Stock | -2.88% | 18.84% | -67.04% | -52.31% | -2.06% |
BEAM Beam Therapeutics Inc. | 28.17% | 11.77% | -8.89% | -30.40% | -12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRME and BEAM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022 | 0.57 |
The correlation between PRME and BEAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PRME:
$596.81M
BEAM:
$3.67B
PRME:
-$1.29
BEAM:
-$0.63
PRME:
163.18
BEAM:
27.72
PRME:
7.78
BEAM:
3.15
PRME:
$3.18M
BEAM:
$132.27M
PRME:
-$4.14M
BEAM:
-$84.92M
PRME:
-$195.72M
BEAM:
-$68.39M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRME vs. BEAM — Risk / Return Rank
PRME
BEAM
PRME vs. BEAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prime Medicine Inc. Common Stock (PRME) and Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRME | BEAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 2.95 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 6.34 | -4.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRME vs. BEAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRME drawdown since its inception was -94.55%, which is greater than BEAM's maximum drawdown of -89.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRME and BEAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRME | BEAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.55% | -89.12% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.52% | -38.15% | -21.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.37% | -67.74% | -24.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.04% | -73.41% | -10.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.61% | -59.93% | -5.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.02% | 17.72% | +20.30% |
Volatility
PRME vs. BEAM - Volatility Comparison
Prime Medicine Inc. Common Stock (PRME) has a higher volatility of 26.45% compared to Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) at 23.00%. This indicates that PRME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRME | BEAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.45% | 23.00% | +3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.90% | 53.52% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.08% | 75.50% | +20.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.38% | 76.10% | +14.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.38% | 80.82% | +9.56% |
Dividends
PRME vs. BEAM - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRME nor BEAM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PRME vs. BEAM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prime Medicine Inc. Common Stock and Beam Therapeutics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PRME and BEAM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRME has higher volatility (26.45%) compared to BEAM (23.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRME dropped -94.55% vs BEAM's -89.12%.
BEAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRME and BEAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer