PRL.TO vs. ENB
Compare and contrast key facts about Propel Holdings Inc (PRL.TO) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB).
Performance
PRL.TO vs. ENB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRL.TO vs. ENB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRL.TO Propel Holdings Inc | -24.56% | -30.42% | 189.93% | 82.62% | -42.90% | 32.77% |
ENB Enbridge Inc. | 16.26% | 14.03% | 37.21% | -3.30% | 14.04% | -5.62% |
Different Trading Currencies
PRL.TO is traded in CAD, while ENB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ENB values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
PRL.TO:
CA$1.41
ENB:
$8.09
PRL.TO:
13.25
ENB:
6.69
PRL.TO:
0.21
ENB:
0.31
PRL.TO:
1.33
ENB:
1.21
PRL.TO:
CA$591.09M
ENB:
$65.19B
PRL.TO:
CA$267.13M
ENB:
$0.00
PRL.TO:
CA$105.40M
ENB:
$10.66B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRL.TO achieves a -24.56% return, which is significantly lower than ENB's 16.26% return.
PRL.TO
- 1D
- 4.78%
- 1M
- -11.33%
- YTD
- -24.56%
- 6M
- -35.31%
- 1Y
- -17.22%
- 3Y*
- 43.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENB
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 25.03%
- 3Y*
- 21.12%
- 5Y*
- 17.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRL.TO vs. ENB — Risk / Return Rank
PRL.TO
ENB
PRL.TO vs. ENB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Propel Holdings Inc (PRL.TO) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRL.TO | ENB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | 1.58 | -1.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | 2.14 | -2.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.28 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 2.66 | -2.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 6.47 | -7.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRL.TO | ENB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | 1.58 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.68 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRL.TO and ENB is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PRL.TO vs. ENB - Dividend Comparison
PRL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than ENB's 5.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRL.TO Propel Holdings Inc | 4.35% | 3.01% | 1.47% | 3.08% | 5.10% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENB Enbridge Inc. | 5.07% | 5.66% | 6.28% | 7.31% | 6.80% | 6.85% | 7.55% | 5.58% | 6.68% | 4.71% | 4.13% | 4.71% |
Drawdowns
PRL.TO vs. ENB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRL.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.80%, which is greater than ENB's maximum drawdown of -38.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRL.TO and ENB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRL.TO | ENB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.80% | -46.35% | -10.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.46% | -9.37% | -44.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.27% | -0.81% | -53.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.01% | -10.88% | -17.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.68% | 3.78% | +24.90% |
Volatility
PRL.TO vs. ENB - Volatility Comparison
Propel Holdings Inc (PRL.TO) has a higher volatility of 20.66% compared to Enbridge Inc. (ENB) at 3.75%. This indicates that PRL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRL.TO | ENB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.66% | 3.75% | +16.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.46% | 11.41% | +28.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.77% | 15.95% | +34.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.33% | 15.52% | +36.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.33% | 21.74% | +30.59% |
Financials
PRL.TO vs. ENB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Propel Holdings Inc and Enbridge Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities