PRGTX vs. FSPTX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX).
PRGTX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 28, 2000. FSPTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 13, 1981.
Performance
PRGTX vs. FSPTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRGTX vs. FSPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | -7.19% | 27.28% | 33.12% | 55.92% | -55.53% | 8.85% | 75.77% | 34.22% | -10.07% | 47.09% |
FSPTX Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio | -8.57% | 23.37% | 41.76% | 59.83% | -36.91% | 21.99% | 63.95% | 51.08% | -9.03% | 49.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGTX achieves a -7.19% return, which is significantly higher than FSPTX's -8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGTX has underperformed FSPTX with an annualized return of 15.10%, while FSPTX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.24% annualized return.
PRGTX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -9.81%
- YTD
- -7.19%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- 32.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
FSPTX
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -7.34%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 6M
- -7.04%
- 1Y
- 31.57%
- 3Y*
- 26.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 22.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRGTX vs. FSPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRGTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPTX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRGTX vs. FSPTX — Risk / Return Rank
PRGTX
FSPTX
PRGTX vs. FSPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRGTX | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.08 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 1.65 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 1.78 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 6.19 | +0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRGTX | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.08 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.52 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.86 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.52 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGTX and FSPTX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRGTX vs. FSPTX - Dividend Comparison
PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.91%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.28% | 27.71% | 5.05% | 0.15% | 24.67% | 15.81% | 9.46% | 10.03% |
FSPTX Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio | 9.91% | 9.06% | 9.42% | 0.01% | 3.95% | 11.62% | 18.86% | 1.86% | 23.77% | 8.32% | 1.54% | 4.19% |
Drawdowns
PRGTX vs. FSPTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGTX drawdown since its inception was -71.18%, smaller than the maximum FSPTX drawdown of -84.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGTX and FSPTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGTX | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.18% | -84.37% | +13.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -15.49% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.29% | -42.16% | -23.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.29% | -42.16% | -23.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.06% | -13.71% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.68% | -27.13% | +5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 4.47% | -0.03% |
Volatility
PRGTX vs. FSPTX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX) at 6.73%. This indicates that PRGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRGTX | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | 6.73% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.69% | 16.55% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.78% | 29.04% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.74% | 27.19% | +4.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.17% | 25.81% | +2.36% |