PRDSX vs. CTSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX).
PRDSX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1997. CTSIX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Mar 23, 2011.
Performance
PRDSX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRDSX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDSX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund | -4.64% | 17.44% | 12.97% | 21.15% | -22.49% | 11.15% | 23.85% | 10.66% |
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund | -4.77% | 25.90% | 44.34% | 7.57% | -37.30% | 9.12% | 63.38% | 1.20% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PRDSX having a -4.64% return and CTSIX slightly lower at -4.77%.
PRDSX
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- -10.24%
- YTD
- -4.64%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
CTSIX
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- -4.77%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 36.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.96%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRDSX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRDSX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRDSX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank
PRDSX
CTSIX
PRDSX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRDSX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 1.29 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.84 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 2.78 | -1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 10.72 | -5.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRDSX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.29 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.11 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.39 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRDSX and CTSIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRDSX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison
PRDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.31%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDSX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund | 13.31% | 12.70% | 7.96% | 2.43% | 3.72% | 13.97% | 2.91% | 4.12% | 4.53% | 0.10% | 0.02% | 1.83% |
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.77% | 4.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PRDSX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRDSX drawdown since its inception was -58.95%, which is greater than CTSIX's maximum drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDSX and CTSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRDSX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.95% | -50.83% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.24% | -12.38% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.17% | -50.60% | +17.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.08% | -12.38% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.23% | -21.13% | +6.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 3.20% | +0.22% |
Volatility
PRDSX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) is 7.45%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 12.38%. This indicates that PRDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRDSX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 12.38% | -4.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.20% | 21.14% | -5.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.29% | 29.23% | -5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.36% | 27.79% | -6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 29.69% | -8.23% |