PRDGX vs. VTI
PRDGX (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PRDGX is actively managed, while VTI is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRDGX returned 13.21%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for VTI. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PRDGX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
PRDGX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PRDGX having a 8.54% return and VTI slightly higher at 8.82%. Over the past 10 years, PRDGX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 13.21%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.
PRDGX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- 1Y
- 18.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
VTI
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
PRDGX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. | 8.54% | 14.74% | 13.48% | 13.68% | -10.22% | 26.03% | 13.92% | 31.76% | -1.06% | 18.89% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 8.82% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRDGX and VTI is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001 | 0.95 |
The correlation between PRDGX and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRDGX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
PRDGX
VTI
PRDGX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRDGX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.73 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.76 | 12.14 | -1.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRDGX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRDGX drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDGX and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRDGX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.79% | -55.45% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -8.92% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.15% | -19.30% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -25.36% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.18% | -35.00% | +1.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -2.85% | +2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -8.01% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 2.00% | -0.21% |
Volatility
PRDGX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) is 2.73%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that PRDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRDGX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 4.95% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 10.05% | -2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.87% | 12.83% | -2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 17.51% | -3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 18.32% | -2.43% |
PRDGX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRDGX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRDGX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
PRDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. | 7.46% | 8.02% | 4.66% | 2.78% | 3.81% | 2.00% | 1.03% | 2.33% | 3.67% | 1.82% | 3.07% | 7.57% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRDGX and VTI have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTI has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to PRDGX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRDGX dropped -49.79% vs VTI's -55.45%.
PRDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRDGX and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer