PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAS.DE vs. PRAC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PRAS.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF (PRAS.DE) and Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PRAS.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRAS.DE
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF
1.94%-5.52%6.51%0.42%-6.75%6.02%-5.49%
PRAC.DE
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A
-1.06%3.03%4.31%7.53%-13.95%-1.04%1.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAS.DE achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly higher than PRAC.DE's -1.06% return.


PRAS.DE

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.80%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.57%
1Y
-3.28%
3Y*
0.66%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*

PRAC.DE

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
-0.86%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
-0.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PRAS.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAS.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PRAC.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PRAS.DE vs. PRAC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAS.DE
PRAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PRAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAC.DE
PRAC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PRAC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAS.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF (PRAS.DE) and Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRAS.DEPRAC.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.44

0.65

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.53

0.94

-1.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.12

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

0.65

-1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.71

2.92

-3.63

PRAS.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAS.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the PRAC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAS.DE and PRAC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRAS.DEPRAC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

0.65

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

-0.09

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

-0.04

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between PRAS.DE and PRAC.DE is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PRAS.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRAS.DE nor PRAC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PRAS.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, roughly equal to the maximum PRAC.DE drawdown of -17.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAS.DE and PRAC.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAS.DEPRAC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-17.86%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.41%

-2.70%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.89%

-17.86%

+4.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.10%

-3.30%

-8.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-6.39%

-4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.16%

0.60%

+4.56%

Volatility

PRAS.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF (PRAS.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE) at 1.62%. This indicates that PRAS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRAC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PRAS.DEPRAC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

1.62%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

2.13%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.44%

3.07%

+4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.03%

4.47%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.12%

4.73%

+3.39%