PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPL vs. SO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PPL vs. SO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PPL Corporation (PPL) and The Southern Company (SO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPL achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than SO's 5.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PPL has underperformed SO with an annualized return of 3.30%, while SO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.


PPL

1D
0.55%
1M
-7.35%
YTD
0.75%
6M
2.18%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
3.30%

SO

1D
-0.02%
1M
-4.95%
YTD
5.45%
6M
4.52%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPL vs. SO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPL
PPL Corporation
0.75%11.38%23.98%-3.77%0.35%12.88%-16.87%33.41%-3.01%-5.19%
SO
The Southern Company
5.45%9.47%21.72%2.21%8.24%16.34%0.63%51.65%-3.75%2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PPL and SO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 1985

0.53

The correlation between PPL and SO shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PPL:

$26.52B

SO:

$102.07B

EPS

PPL:

$1.63

SO:

$3.92

PE Ratio

PPL:

21.47

SO:

23.08

PEG Ratio

PPL:

17.98

SO:

1.43

PS Ratio

PPL:

2.81

SO:

3.34

PB Ratio

PPL:

1.21

SO:

2.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

PPL:

$9.31B

SO:

$30.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PPL:

$4.34B

SO:

$13.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

PPL:

$3.38B

SO:

$14.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPL vs. SO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPL
PPL Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPL Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SO
SO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPL vs. SO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PPL Corporation (PPL) and The Southern Company (SO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPLSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.06

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

0.29

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.98

0.68

+0.30

PPL vs. SO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is comparable to the SO Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPL and SO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPLSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

0.27

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.60

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.48

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.62

-0.19

Drawdowns

PPL vs. SO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPL drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than SO's maximum drawdown of -38.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPL and SO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPLSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-38.43%

-16.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-14.99%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.84%

-14.99%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.73%

-23.28%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.73%

-38.43%

-10.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.03%

-7.94%

-4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.62%

-6.87%

-8.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.82%

6.32%

-1.50%

Volatility

PPL vs. SO - Volatility Comparison

PPL Corporation (PPL) and The Southern Company (SO) have volatilities of 5.79% and 5.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPLSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

5.85%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.88%

12.95%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

15.96%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

18.64%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.78%

21.94%

+0.84%

Dividends

PPL vs. SO - Dividend Comparison

PPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than SO's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPL
PPL Corporation
3.15%3.11%3.17%3.54%2.99%5.52%5.89%4.60%5.79%5.11%4.46%11.74%
SO
The Southern Company
3.29%3.37%3.47%3.96%3.78%3.82%4.13%3.86%5.42%4.78%4.52%4.60%

Financials

PPL vs. SO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PPL Corporation and The Southern Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
2.77B
8.40B
(PPL) Total Revenue
(SO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PPL vs. SO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PPL Corporation and The Southern Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
69.3%
46.5%
Portfolio components
PPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PPL Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 2.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.3%.

SO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported a gross profit of 3.90B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.

PPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PPL Corporation reported an operating income of 745.00M and revenue of 2.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.9%.

SO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported an operating income of 2.02B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

PPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PPL Corporation reported a net income of 452.00M and revenue of 2.77B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.

SO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported a net income of 1.36B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PPL and SO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SO has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to PPL (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPL dropped -55.38% vs SO's -38.43%.

PPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPL and SO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer