PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMTGX vs. PDMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMTGX vs. PDMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIA MBS Bond Fund (PMTGX) and PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund (PDMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMTGX achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than PDMIX's 1.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PMTGX has underperformed PDMIX with an annualized return of 1.20%, while PDMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.56% annualized return.


PMTGX

1D
0.48%
1M
0.91%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.60%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
1.20%

PDMIX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.77%
YTD
1.45%
6M
1.42%
1Y
5.95%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMTGX vs. PDMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PMTGX
PIA MBS Bond Fund
0.66%7.83%0.96%4.73%-11.37%-1.18%3.85%6.02%0.76%2.35%
PDMIX
PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund
1.45%8.43%1.59%6.03%-13.96%-0.65%5.78%6.57%0.83%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PMTGX and PDMIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2006

0.83

The correlation between PMTGX and PDMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMTGX vs. PDMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMTGX
PMTGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PMTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PMTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PDMIX
PDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMTGX vs. PDMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIA MBS Bond Fund (PMTGX) and PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund (PDMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMTGXPDMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.85

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

5.90

-1.72

PMTGX vs. PDMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMTGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the PDMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMTGX and PDMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMTGX vs. PDMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMTGX drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, smaller than the maximum PDMIX drawdown of -18.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMTGX and PDMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMTGXPDMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.09%

-18.64%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.68%

-3.24%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.66%

-7.13%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.86%

-18.59%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.09%

-18.64%

+1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.14%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.13%

-1.75%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

1.01%

+0.22%

Volatility

PMTGX vs. PDMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIA MBS Bond Fund (PMTGX) is 1.23%, while PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund (PDMIX) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that PMTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMTGXPDMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.48%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

3.45%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34%

4.45%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.30%

6.69%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.78%

5.08%

-0.30%

PMTGX vs. PDMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMTGX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than PDMIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMTGX vs. PDMIX - Dividend Comparison

PMTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than PDMIX's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDMIX
PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund
4.29%4.29%4.66%3.76%3.84%2.03%2.40%3.41%3.10%2.96%2.93%2.14%
PMTGX
PIA MBS Bond Fund
3.71%4.10%4.16%3.48%2.17%0.79%2.12%2.96%2.76%2.75%2.96%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMTGX and PDMIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDMIX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to PMTGX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMTGX dropped -17.09% vs PDMIX's -18.64%.

PDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMTGX and PDMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer