PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PK vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PK vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PK achieves a 30.72% return, which is significantly higher than MAR's 20.95% return.


PK

1D
3.49%
1M
17.62%
YTD
30.72%
6M
32.42%
1Y
44.39%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
-1.04%
10Y*

MAR

1D
-0.85%
1M
5.50%
YTD
20.95%
6M
23.16%
1Y
44.35%
3Y*
29.47%
5Y*
22.61%
10Y*
19.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PK vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
30.72%-18.45%0.98%49.45%-36.03%10.09%-30.13%6.86%1.69%13.76%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
20.95%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PK and MAR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2017

0.62

The correlation between PK and MAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

PK:

-$1.08

MAR:

$12.66

PS Ratio

PK:

1.05

MAR:

3.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

PK:

$2.53B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PK:

-$119.00M

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

PK:

$291.00M

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PK vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PK
PK Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PK Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PK Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PK vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PKMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.71

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

2.61

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

3.39

-0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.18

8.53

-2.35

PK vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PK Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PK and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PKMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.71

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.79

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.47

-0.47

Drawdowns

PK vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PK drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, which is greater than MAR's maximum drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PK and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.22%

-75.59%

-8.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.08%

-12.65%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.83%

-30.50%

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.83%

-30.50%

-19.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.33%

-3.14%

-31.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-14.91%

-19.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.71%

5.03%

+1.68%

Volatility

PK vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) has a higher volatility of 10.72% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 7.01%. This indicates that PK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.72%

7.01%

+3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.67%

20.04%

+2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.20%

26.12%

+6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.62%

28.82%

+8.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.11%

32.88%

+13.23%

Dividends

PK vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

PK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than MAR's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.73%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
7.49%9.56%9.95%14.05%2.37%0.00%2.62%7.34%12.86%16.10%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PK vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
622.00M
1.81B
(PK) Total Revenue
(MAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PK and MAR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PK has higher volatility (10.72%) compared to MAR (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PK dropped -84.22% vs MAR's -75.59%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PK and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer