PK vs. MAR
PK (Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.) and MAR (Marriott International, Inc.) are both stocks. PK operates in REIT - Hotel & Motel (Real Estate), while MAR operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, PK returned -1.04%/yr vs 22.61%/yr for MAR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PK vs. MAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PK achieves a 30.72% return, which is significantly higher than MAR's 20.95% return.
PK
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- 17.62%
- YTD
- 30.72%
- 6M
- 32.42%
- 1Y
- 44.39%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- -1.04%
- 10Y*
- —
MAR
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 20.95%
- 6M
- 23.16%
- 1Y
- 44.35%
- 3Y*
- 29.47%
- 5Y*
- 22.61%
- 10Y*
- 19.66%
PK vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. | 30.72% | -18.45% | 0.98% | 49.45% | -36.03% | 10.09% | -30.13% | 6.86% | 1.69% | 13.76% |
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 20.95% | 12.31% | 24.92% | 53.06% | -9.34% | 25.26% | -12.53% | 41.49% | -19.05% | 66.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between PK and MAR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between PK and MAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PK:
-$1.08
MAR:
$12.66
PK:
1.05
MAR:
3.51
PK:
$2.53B
MAR:
$21.73B
PK:
-$119.00M
MAR:
$1.31B
PK:
$291.00M
MAR:
$3.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PK vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank
PK
MAR
PK vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PK | MAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 1.71 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.61 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.30 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.39 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 8.53 | -2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PK | MAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.71 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.79 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.47 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
PK vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PK drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, which is greater than MAR's maximum drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PK and MAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PK | MAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.22% | -75.59% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.08% | -12.65% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.83% | -30.50% | -14.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.83% | -30.50% | -19.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.33% | -3.14% | -31.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.08% | -14.91% | -19.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.71% | 5.03% | +1.68% |
Volatility
PK vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) has a higher volatility of 10.72% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 7.01%. This indicates that PK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PK | MAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.72% | 7.01% | +3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.67% | 20.04% | +2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.20% | 26.12% | +6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.62% | 28.82% | +8.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.11% | 32.88% | +13.23% |
Dividends
PK vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison
PK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than MAR's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 0.73% | 0.85% | 0.86% | 0.87% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 0.95% | 1.39% | 1.42% |
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. | 7.49% | 9.56% | 9.95% | 14.05% | 2.37% | 0.00% | 2.62% | 7.34% | 12.86% | 16.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PK vs. MAR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PK and MAR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PK has higher volatility (10.72%) compared to MAR (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PK dropped -84.22% vs MAR's -75.59%.
MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PK and MAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer