PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PK vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PK vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PK achieves a 50.05% return, which is significantly higher than MAR's 20.64% return.


PK

1D
0.00%
1M
4.44%
6M
43.59%
YTD
50.05%
1Y
60.38%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.11%

MAR

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.03%
6M
18.71%
YTD
20.64%
1Y
47.30%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
21.60%
10Y*
19.19%
ALL TIME*
15.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$498.48M$519.42M$558.67M
$51.61M$56.17M$68.18M

PK vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
50.05%-18.45%0.98%49.45%-36.03%10.09%-30.13%6.86%1.69%12.59%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
20.64%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PK and MAR is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.62

The correlation between PK and MAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PK:

$3.03B

MAR:

$98.31B

EPS

PK:

-$1.08

MAR:

$14.30

PS Ratio

PK:

1.19

MAR:

3.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

PK:

$2.53B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PK:

-$119.00M

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

PK:

$291.00M

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PK vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PK
PK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PK Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PK vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PKMARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.38

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

9.06

-0.63

PK vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PK Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PK and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PK vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PK drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, which is greater than MAR's maximum drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PK and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.22%

-75.59%

-8.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.08%

-12.65%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.83%

-30.50%

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.38%

-30.50%

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.62%

-7.38%

-17.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-14.86%

-19.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.46%

4.72%

+1.74%

Volatility

PK vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) have volatilities of 7.17% and 7.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

7.10%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.61%

19.70%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.99%

26.66%

+4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.12%

28.68%

+8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.82%

32.80%

+13.02%

Dividends

PK vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

PK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than MAR's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.73%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
6.64%9.56%9.95%14.05%2.37%0.00%2.62%7.34%12.86%16.10%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PK vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PK and MAR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PK has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to MAR (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PK dropped -84.22% vs MAR's -75.59%.

PK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PK and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer