PIP.L vs. KKR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PipeHawk PLC (PIP.L) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR).

Performance

PIP.L vs. KKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in PipeHawk PLC (PIP.L) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PIP.L vs. KKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PIP.L PipeHawk PLC	-25.58%	-20.37%	-67.27%	-43.10%	-17.14%	133.33%	22.45%	22.50%	33.33%	11.11%
KKR KKR & Co. Inc.	-25.93%	-19.50%	82.78%	71.46%	-29.49%	87.52%	36.98%	45.80%	1.39%	29.52%

Different Trading Currencies

PIP.L is traded in GBp, while KKR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KKR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap PIP.L : £581.01K KKR : $88.40B
EPS PIP.L : -£0.03 KKR : $2.48
PS Ratio PIP.L : 0.05 KKR : 4.58
Total Revenue (TTM) PIP.L : £12.88M KKR : $19.26B
Gross Profit (TTM) PIP.L : £7.48M KKR : $8.06B
EBITDA (TTM) PIP.L : -£594.00K KKR : $7.13B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PIP.L having a -25.58% return and KKR slightly lower at -25.93%. Over the past 10 years, PIP.L has underperformed KKR with an annualized return of -8.16%, while KKR has yielded a comparatively higher 23.56% annualized return.

PIP.L

• 1D: -15.79%
• 1M: -36.00%
• YTD: -25.58%
• 6M: -3.03%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -49.26%
• 5Y*: -27.06%
• 10Y*: -8.16%

KKR

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: 7.57%
• YTD: -25.93%
• 6M: -27.36%
• 1Y: -21.34%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 14.94%
• 10Y*: 23.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PIP.L vs. KKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIP.L

PIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 47
PIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
PIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

KKR

KKR Risk / Return Rank: 25
KKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
KKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
KKR Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
KKR Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIP.L vs. KKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PipeHawk PLC (PIP.L) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PIP.L	KKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.00	-0.46	+0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	-0.39	+1.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.95	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.00	-0.47	+0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.00	-1.07	+1.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PIP.L vs. KKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is higher than the KKR Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIP.L and KKR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PIP.L	KKR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00	-0.46	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32	0.40	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.08	0.66	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.59	-0.70

Correlation

The correlation between PIP.L and KKR is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PIP.L vs. KKR - Dividend Comparison

PIP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PIP.L PipeHawk PLC	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KKR KKR & Co. Inc.	0.80%	0.57%	0.47%	0.78%	1.31%	0.77%	1.31%	1.71%	3.23%	3.18%	4.16%	10.13%

Drawdowns

PIP.L vs. KKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, which is greater than KKR's maximum drawdown of -53.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIP.L and KKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIP.L	KKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.88%	-53.10%	-45.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.65%	-44.62%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.12%	-49.42%	-47.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.12%	-49.42%	-47.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.21%	-44.22%	-53.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.58%	-15.88%	-70.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.08%	19.23%	+3.85%

Volatility

PIP.L vs. KKR - Volatility Comparison

PipeHawk PLC (PIP.L) has a higher volatility of 29.99% compared to KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) at 10.73%. This indicates that PIP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIP.L	KKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.99%	10.73%	+19.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.93%	29.57%	+38.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.19%	46.10%	+58.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	84.99%	37.53%	+47.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	102.31%	35.78%	+66.53%

Financials

PIP.L vs. KKR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PipeHawk PLC and KKR & Co. Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PIP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PipeHawk PLC reported a gross profit of 1.57M and revenue of 1.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.7%.

KKR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KKR & Co. Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.74B and revenue of 5.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

PIP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PipeHawk PLC reported an operating income of -119.00K and revenue of 1.65M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.2%.

KKR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KKR & Co. Inc. reported an operating income of 328.66M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

PIP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PipeHawk PLC reported a net income of -318.00K and revenue of 1.65M, resulting in a net margin of -19.2%.

KKR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KKR & Co. Inc. reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.