PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINT.L vs. CUKX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PINT.L vs. CUKX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Pantheon Infrastructure PLC (PINT.L) and iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PINT.L vs. CUKX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PINT.L
Pantheon Infrastructure PLC
3.41%26.86%11.65%-6.93%-10.39%1.56%
CUKX.L
iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
5.58%25.78%9.30%7.72%4.97%1.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINT.L achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than CUKX.L's 5.58% return.


PINT.L

1D
0.92%
1M
-5.32%
YTD
3.41%
6M
4.05%
1Y
19.23%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10Y*

CUKX.L

1D
1.94%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
5.58%
6M
11.87%
1Y
24.42%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINT.L vs. CUKX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINT.L
PINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CUKX.L
CUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINT.L vs. CUKX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pantheon Infrastructure PLC (PINT.L) and iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINT.LCUKX.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

1.88

-1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

2.38

-1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.40

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.74

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.63

10.57

-5.94

PINT.L vs. CUKX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINT.L and CUKX.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PINT.LCUKX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

1.88

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.54

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between PINT.L and CUKX.L is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PINT.L vs. CUKX.L - Dividend Comparison

PINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, while CUKX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
PINT.L
Pantheon Infrastructure PLC
3.95%3.94%4.60%3.57%1.07%
CUKX.L
iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PINT.L vs. CUKX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINT.L drawdown since its inception was -31.61%, smaller than the maximum CUKX.L drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINT.L and CUKX.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PINT.LCUKX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.61%

-34.50%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-10.55%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.32%

-4.40%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.09%

-4.40%

-7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

2.36%

+1.63%

Volatility

PINT.L vs. CUKX.L - Volatility Comparison

Pantheon Infrastructure PLC (PINT.L) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) at 5.35%. This indicates that PINT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUKX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PINT.LCUKX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.74%

5.35%

+3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.19%

8.43%

+6.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.75%

12.96%

+9.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

12.66%

+10.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

15.05%

+8.03%