PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PINK vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PINKXLF
YTD Return17.45%33.79%
1Y Return33.70%49.31%
3Y Return (Ann)7.01%9.45%
Sharpe Ratio2.553.54
Sortino Ratio3.604.96
Omega Ratio1.451.65
Calmar Ratio2.523.19
Martin Ratio13.9825.45
Ulcer Index2.47%1.93%
Daily Std Dev13.52%13.86%
Max Drawdown-18.45%-82.69%
Current Drawdown-3.55%-0.30%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between PINK and XLF is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PINK vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PINK achieves a 17.45% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 33.79% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.01%
19.70%
PINK
XLF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PINK vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.


PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
Expense ratio chart for PINK: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for XLF: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PINK vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PINK, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.55
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PINK, currently valued at 3.60, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.60
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PINK, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PINK, currently valued at 2.52, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.52
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PINK, currently valued at 13.98, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.98
XLF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLF, currently valued at 3.54, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLF, currently valued at 4.96, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.65
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLF, currently valued at 3.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLF, currently valued at 25.45, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0025.45

PINK vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINK Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINK and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.55
3.54
PINK
XLF

Dividends

PINK vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

PINK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than XLF's 1.34% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
0.50%0.94%0.42%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.34%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%1.95%1.61%1.47%

Drawdowns

PINK vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINK drawdown since its inception was -18.45%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINK and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.55%
-0.30%
PINK
XLF

Volatility

PINK vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) is 4.30%, while Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that PINK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.30%
7.08%
PINK
XLF