PGLOX vs. ZFL.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Consumer Fund (PGLOX) and BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO).
PGLOX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 26, 2016. ZFL.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the FTSE TMX Canada Long Term Federal Bond Index. It was launched on May 19, 2010.
Performance
PGLOX vs. ZFL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGLOX vs. ZFL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGLOX T. Rowe Price Global Consumer Fund | 0.16% | 6.68% | 12.94% | 19.53% | -27.34% | 8.82% | 31.60% | 24.85% | -7.60% | 19.98% |
ZFL.TO BMO Long Federal Bond | -1.50% | -0.59% | -9.93% | 9.75% | -28.98% | -6.79% | 14.93% | 14.16% | -5.28% | 10.14% |
Different Trading Currencies
PGLOX is traded in USD, while ZFL.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZFL.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGLOX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than ZFL.TO's -1.50% return.
PGLOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 6.43%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- —
ZFL.TO
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -5.10%
- YTD
- -1.50%
- 6M
- -2.51%
- 1Y
- -5.91%
- 3Y*
- -2.79%
- 5Y*
- -6.35%
- 10Y*
- -2.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGLOX vs. ZFL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGLOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than ZFL.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGLOX vs. ZFL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PGLOX
ZFL.TO
PGLOX vs. ZFL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Consumer Fund (PGLOX) and BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGLOX | ZFL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | -0.52 | +1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.90 | -0.63 | +1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.93 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | -0.61 | +1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.58 | -1.13 | +4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGLOX | ZFL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | -0.52 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | -0.40 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.00 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGLOX and ZFL.TO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PGLOX vs. ZFL.TO - Dividend Comparison
PGLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.18%, more than ZFL.TO's 3.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGLOX T. Rowe Price Global Consumer Fund | 53.18% | 53.27% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.05% | 6.77% | 1.31% | 0.33% | 2.03% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZFL.TO BMO Long Federal Bond | 3.01% | 3.13% | 3.20% | 3.49% | 3.77% | 2.85% | 2.57% | 2.95% | 3.00% | 2.99% | 3.05% | 3.10% |
Drawdowns
PGLOX vs. ZFL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGLOX drawdown since its inception was -35.54%, smaller than the maximum ZFL.TO drawdown of -41.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGLOX and ZFL.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGLOX | ZFL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.54% | -40.32% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -10.39% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.54% | -32.25% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -33.68% | +32.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -12.23% | +3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 6.78% | -4.81% |
Volatility
PGLOX vs. ZFL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global Consumer Fund (PGLOX) is 0.00%, while BMO Long Federal Bond (ZFL.TO) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that PGLOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZFL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGLOX | ZFL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 3.97% | -3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.87% | 6.90% | -2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 11.53% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 16.12% | +0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 13.81% | +2.90% |